DONALD TRUMP SAID he “absolutely” plans to testify in the federal government’s case against him regarding classified documents he removed from the White House. “I’m allowed to do whatever I want … I’m allowed to do everything I did,” the former president told conservative podcast host Hugh Hewitt.

In an interview on “The Hugh Hewitt Show” that dropped Wednesday, the host asked Trump, “Did you direct anyone to move the boxes, Mr. President? Did you tell anyone to move the boxes?” referring to the boxes of more than 300 classified documents the federal government seized last year from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

“I don’t talk about anything. You know why? Because I’m allowed to do whatever I want. I come under the Presidential Records Act,” Trump replied, while also taking a quick detour to bash Hewitt. “I’m not telling you. You know, every time I talk to you, ‘Oh, I have a breaking story.’ You don’t have any story. I come under the Presidential Records Act. I’m allowed to do everything I did.”

      • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        His lawyers actually said that while he was president. They said he was incapable of being deposed without perjuring himself. Eventually they sent 10 questions written out and he had his lawyers with him to help respond.

        • Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          They said he was incapable of being deposed without perjuring himself.

          “Perjury trap” is a fake term that tries to place the blame for “My client is a compulsive liar and literally can’t tell the truth to save his life” on the other party. And whoever came up with the term deserves both a raise for being amazing at their job, and a knee to the groin for being a shit human being.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            And whoever came up with the term deserves both a raise for being amazing at their job, and a knee to the groin for being a shit human being.

            So, a lawyer.

      • catfish@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can def see a man-child reaction exactly like this dumb statement -kinda like what he did on the debates with Hillary and Biden, interrupting and interjecting his sad alternate reality- as the cases pick up steam and hes forced to fly between Fla, DC, Ga and wherever his current cult rally/grievance is that day, oh boy, is it gonna be fun or what?

        • Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thing is, neither a man-child reaction, nor making deranged statements, helps you in court. So, I’m imagining his lawyers will instruct him to please shut the hell up.

    • holiday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems like he is showing what his defense will be. It won’t be whether he moved documents or shared confidential information or whatever. It will be them challenging the scope of power of the presidency.

      • Endorkend@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The defense comes down to the Afluenza Defense. Note, to my knowledge that never really worked before.

        He keeps repeating he thinks he’s allowed to do all these things and even when found in court he isn’t allowed to do those things, they’ll try to say he didn’t know.

        Thing is, he’s playing dumb now, while he’s repeatedly shown he knows full well what’s right and what’s wrong, his statements like how he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and no one would do anything about it, or the grab em by the pussy line.

        He made statements showing he knows perfectly fine these are things one shouldn’t do, but he does them anyway as he was never held responsible and could get away with it.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except in the cases of Brock Turner, the convicted rapist and Ethan Couch, the teen who killed 4 people driving drunk and only served 2 years in prison.

          And then there’s all the deferred sentence stuff that practically every white collar criminal gets to stay rich and out of prison.

      • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not really the scope of power so much as destroying Trump’s delusional interpretation of the Presidential Record’s Act.

        If he honestly tries that in court he’s going to get “Um, actually” lawyer-splained so fast BARRON’S kid’s heads will spin.

  • hstde@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    He can in fact do whatever he wants, he just needs to deal with the consequences of his actions.

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    he’s allowed to do whatever he wants with whatever and whoever he wants whenever he wants or why else is he the king

  • Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Candidate Trump needs to be belligerent and defiant. Defendant Trump needs to STFU.

    The problem is those two things are in competition. So he has to say, Russia, Russia, Russia as candidate Trump, but that isn’t a relevant or useful argument for defendant Trump. He has to say, “I’m allowed to do this thing” as candidate Trump, but as defendant Trump, I’m allowed to break the law is not a defense.

    His only hope is to delay. If he goes to trial on anything, defendant Trump loses. If he can hold out, then candidate Trump will win.

    This is his bet. He wins and it all goes away and the US is ruled by a guy who believes he can get away with anything.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ….aT which point his lawyer jumped in and said the the real trump would never say that … fake fake prank call don’t ever call here again!!

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Donald Trump said he “absolutely” plans to testify in the federal government’s case against him regarding classified documents he removed from the White House.

    In an interview on “The Hugh Hewitt Show” that dropped Wednesday, the host asked Trump, “Did you direct anyone to move the boxes, Mr. President?

    I come under the Presidential Records Act,” Trump replied, while also taking a quick detour to bash Hewitt.

    The law states: “Upon the conclusion of a President’s term of office, or if a President serves consecutive terms upon the conclusion of the last term, the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President.” There is an allowance for presidents to keep records that are of “a purely private or nonpublic character” and unrelated to presidential duties, but many of the documents Trump was found to possess came from government agencies, such as the C.I.A.

    When Hewitt asked Trump if he would testify in his own defense at the trial in the documents case, the former president said, “That, I would do.

    In addition to discussing his legal troubles, Hewitt asked Trump for his thoughts on an unrelated topic: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.


    The original article contains 567 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 63%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s true. A president can do whatever he wants , it’s called diplomatic immunity. Every president has it, which is why none of them have ever been tried for a crime before.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not how diplomatic immunity works. It’s to protect them in a foreign country while they’re there. So a diplomat stationed in France can’t be tried by the French authorities. It has nothing to do with being brought up on charges in their home country, and definitely doesn’t mean they can do whatever they want.

    • httpjames@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Presidential Records Act requires that all presidential records be transferred into the custody of the National Archives at the end of the administration.

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        That doesn’t make it a crime to keep a few papers as a souvenir. Biden did the same thing btw he kept souvenir papers in the garage with his cool car. They all do it.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He doesn’t need you to be his lawyer. It’s not internet discussions that will prover if someone did anything outside of the law.

      If Trump was just a bit more clever he could have saved himself a lot of trouble by just complying with the request of giving the stuff back.

      • MrBusinessMan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not possible for a president to do a crime and get in trouble for it, it’s never happened before in the history of presidents!

        • ArtyTester@artemis.camp
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe it needs to happen more.

          The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago, the second best time is now.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it never happened before is not a guarantee it won’t happen in the future. Trump is a first in very many ways. If he had any bit of restraint in him he would have gotten away with it. He’s just the first ex president to be stubborn enough to not stop doing illegal things after leaving the office.

            • Akasazh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not really, just the one that doesn’t know when to stop or moderate. Nixon could have been imprisoned, but knew when to bind in and tap out. Only your Orange idol is as thick that he thinks he’s forever above the law.