• BostonSamurai@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 minutes ago

    Oh no, not the plagiarizing machine! How are rich hacks going to feign talent now? Pay an artist for it?! Crazy!

  • geography082@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Fuck these psychos. They should pay the copyright they stole with the billions they already made. Governments should protect people, MDF

  • Rakonat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    6 hours ago

    At the end of the day the fact that openai lost their collective shit when a Chinese company used their data and model to make their own more efficient model is all the proof I need they don’t care about being fair or equitable when they get mad at people doing the exact thing they did and would aggressively oppose others using their own work to advance their own.

  • azalty@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    To be fair, they’re not wrong. We need to find a legal comprise that satisfies everyone

  • merdaverse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 hours ago

    TLDR: “we should be able to steal other people’s work, or we’ll go crying to daddy Trump. But DeepSeek shouldn’t be able to steal from the stuff we stole, because China and open source”

  • Daerun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Why training openai with literally millions of copyrighted works is fair use, but me downloading an episode of a series not available in any platform means years of prison?

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    If giant megacorporations can benefit by ignoring copyright, us mortals should be able to as well.

    Until then, you have the public domain to train on. If you don’t want AI to talk like the 1920s, you shouldn’t have extended copyright and robbed society of a robust public domain.