• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    in brazil, we used to have a law forcing this to be a thing. back in the laptop days, it used to be reasonably common for people to buy one without with linux, and pirate windows later to save money. or because it was plain cheaper.

    it turns out brazil fomented a big userbase for linux for a while there. free market my ass, microsoft is an oligopoly. if this ever gets widespread i’m pretty sure adoption will grow for the simple fact people will at least get to fucking try it. microsoft wouldnt take it kindly though.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Wow, I didn’t realize the windows tax was that high. I thought the bulk OEM licensing was significantly cheaper than the retail price.

    • The Menemen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Fedora or Ubuntu. But I’d say the important part is that they probably provide all necessary drivers.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Usually enabling Ubuntu’s third party / proprietary repo covers all necessary drivers.

        I remember having lots of driver issues on fedora but that was like two decades ago. I’d imagine they have that sorted now.

        Anyway this is good news. Grow the user base.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        These seem to be the two most commonly supported distros by laptop manufacturers. Framework officially support these two distros, too (they have unofficial guides for a bunch of other distros though)