Apple has deployed a system called Private Access Tokens that allows web servers to verify if a device is legitimate before granting access. This works by having the browser request a signed token from Apple proving the device is approved. While this currently has limited impact due to Safari’s market share, there are concerns that attestation systems restrict competition, user control, and innovation by only approving certain devices and software. Attestation could lead to approved providers tightening rules over time, blocking modified operating systems and browsers. While proponents argue for holdbacks to limit blocking, business pressures may make that infeasible and Google’s existing attestation does not do holdbacks. Fundamentally, attestation is seen as anti-competitive by potentially blocking competition between browsers and operating systems on the web.

  • Neato@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 years ago

    Expect corporations to be lazy. Just look at how every website handles cookies now. They could do it smartly, limit their cookie exposure, or only send the messages to IPs in the EU. But they just put an “accept all cookies or get out” OK box on your screen. And that’s what they’re going to do once attestation gets popular.

    Sites will just require an attestation token and likely only accept ones from Safari and Chromium browsers since those are the ones pushing it. That will effectively make Firefox, Opera and other browsers incompatible with those websites. And once it catches on or becomes law somewhere, it’ll be the entire internet. It’s an extremely anticompetitive measure and it’s internet-wide DRM. Fuck. that.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      But they just put an “accept all cookies or get out” OK box on your screen.

      Which doesn’t comply with GDPR

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        Which only affects companies doing business in the EU. Granted, that’s most of the big players.

        Very grateful for the EU to unfuck most of the world from a lot of American regulatory capture.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    If a website doesn’t want me to see their shit, then I guess i won’t see their shit. I already have some sites that don’t work because of my aggressive use of lists on my pihole, in addition to the usual browser plugins. If a site doesn’t work now, I just move on. I don’t give a shit about any site enough to put up with this type of bullshit.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If a website doesn’t want me to see their shit, then I guess i won’t see their shit

      That’s how I react to Twitter and Facebook requiring login to even view most things.

      Whatever you’re showing isn’t important enough to be worth me making an account.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      What if it’s your bank’s website? Or email provider? Or literally anything else you actually have to choose and can’t pick? “It’s okay because I don’t think it affects me / I can ignore it” is always a bad reason to allow a bad thing happen.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Sorry, your device appears to be running Linux, please only use approved Apple or Windows devices to log in, with our required surveillance system pro installed. Thanks.”