• itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh believe me we will, but we have to wait for them to call an election (likely autumn 2024). They’re roundly despised and they know it. They’re just milking as much as they can before they’re flung out of Parliament.

      They’re a disgrace.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Which makes you wonder what the point in this bill even is. They will barely get an opportunity to make use of it.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is there any indication that Labour would be any better on this particular issue?

        • WeThePilgrims@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Very very very little indication they would be better, and I’m very left of center in politics.

          Starmer is very suss as far as I’m concerned, I’m not at all comfortable with his purges…if he gets in, we’ll see.

        • itsmikeyd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Idk. Im very pessimistic that this county is capable of any reasonable decision making tbh.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Keep using software that doesn’t bow. Let them struggle to enforce any encryption ban. Safety in numbers.

        • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Aye. The logical conclusion to this if left unchecked is restriction all the way down to the OS level. Don’t let them take this first step. If they do, the others will follow.

  • Rusticus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Apple has said they’ll pull out of UK if required. I won’t use any software that abides.

      • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I might be cynical af but I believe China is a market they can’t ignore, but the UK, well…they can afford to send a message there. With some quick google-fu it looks like Apple sells more iPhones about every 8 days than it sells in the UK in a year. That’s comparing 2023 numbers for China to 2019 numbers in the UK for the record, I’m too lazy to look past the first few links really, and doubt that math would change enough to ruin the point.

        They also wouldn’t pull out of the UK, they would likely just revert to SMS there in the messages app rather than give the UK a back door into their encryption.

  • birdcat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Oh wow, the great UK really seems to love to show the world how advanced they are. Decrypt this then 🙄

    Password is only 8 characters.

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----

    jA0ECQMIg4RgH82c4/j+0sC6ASlYlE5UsjX2pJ7EL+c/XvjBdn2sfeaWyVZQenMW h+eMDp4vCSbhvVHpzVjwo0mJVKyLnINzjelRVQH0mPBuvs8wsGPitJ04xkixBrEI j/BDvunCqQHKh2rDSbqubuA64+74Zg2FqGsAgnTrxfK/78AFPfL1jM4GODxLt5IT duxVd06lE/zqJmhBL0uInovdKRsOjDoueHJBeXOSFpfYCoUcQsNkcOCZ7XiaaQus CUKVs1nCHWQZtjlRTxUzBRjkNFFVumXY+XI2S35ER8FveB6LdL0bqWCsJxSVUCMb +G3v5ckD/dvxVCrjxfeA4Xlvvk5ivZwsmkaWLz0KUl8tooxD3LBmbU3OTZ27sRxW SgTwGewFgxDTAlcbKaW46WI/Stbs3knYc2rQbMpu/DHqjz2GsYBENXOZEMYCnNtB tgRj6I5IqPieP2ZHUBXu8/ijL6Kl6UxKRtit7m0kttCfFWY8a1yhRfXGn57ZByxi Tj8jFHypznwgpSTE =cl6h -----END PGP MESSAGE-----

    • jibbist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Scottish Indy movement has been put back by 10+ years after the political and possibly illegal financial fuckups of the main indy party SNP.

      They still have control over most of Scotland, but their political power in Westminster is still fairly small, this might change next election though

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      especially with the rumors of Scotland getting independence.

      Yeah, that’s not how it works.

  • RoundSparrow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    There are so many trends with technology that seem to favor another 1930’s Europe situation. The 1940 film “The Great Dictator” describes it pretty well, and it is sad how much love and compassion seem to be out of favor as people march more and more towards mechanized hate-driven systems of society. I really hope a pro-humanism civil rights movement takes hold, like Martin Luther King Jr’s kind of teaching, but it seems to not happen that a popular person like that comes to the top. Even a Carl Sagan type person with mass popularity to much of what Sagan shared in his books and speeches would be a good direction.

  • Certainity45@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Just two years ago the politicians fearmongered that quantum computers will break every encryption without delay. This bill speaks quite different story.

    • sanpo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Sure, the title sounds like clickbait, but the point is: if a big enough player passes these laws, then the other countries may follow.

    • renormalizer@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If they force messengers to implement backdoors into the protocol, I doubt they will limit it to UK users. Also, conversations with UK users won’t be private anymore even if the other party is from another country.

      Client-side scanning might not be enforced for other accounts but when the infrastructure is there other governments will want to use it, too.

      • Steeve@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That definitely won’t happen. Full E2EE apps like Signal, iMessage, and WhatsApp aren’t going to risk the worldwide backlash that would come with implementing backdoor access. The UK market isn’t that big and definitely not worth it, they’d pull out of the UK entirely first.

        • renormalizer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I hope they will. My guess is that a nonprofit like Signal will pull out. They have nothing to gain and a reputation to lose. The others will probably comply by implementing some form of client-side scanning.

      • michel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I wonder if it will be analogous to the situation in China. Is an iMessage conversation safe if one party is based in China and their data is stored in data centers there?

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Welp I don’t live in the UK so there is not much I can do. I would encourage any UK citizen to protest this immediately. If it still passes openly break the law to make the UK government into a laughing stock

  • paulcdb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Or we could all just vote for people that aren’t corrupt… or at least, yet!

    If you don’t know who isn’t corrupt, vote for independents that understand technology. I know it’ll never happen so things will continue to go downhill but gees, what do governments have to do to get people to wake up? 🤬

    Hell, i’ll be happy if people just stopped believing ‘for the sack of the children’ crap and realise its all about controlling the population! 🙄🤦‍♂️

    • RoundSparrow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      we could all just vote for people that aren’t corrupt

      Audiences who flock to liars and deceivers seems to be trending in bad direction. Business leaders, politicians. What Cambridge Analytica unleashed as mass psychology tactics in 2014 may be very difficult to undo.

      corrupt… or at least, yet!

      Things like term limits seemed to help stop some of the problems of people corrupting once they got into positions of power. But now it seems crowds of more and more people are choosing pre-corrupted, cheering on corruption.

    • birdcat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yea voting is great, but when was the last time the UK had a prime minister that anyone voted for?

  • OrkneyKomodo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I get the importance, but the global implications are being slightly overstated. It may be the thin end of the wedge in terms that it may lead other governments to follow suit. But all that will happen in the short term is that many IM clients will withdraw from the UK. Apple will probably just disable iMessage in the UK.

    • honk@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      No. It‘s the opposite of a new world order.

      It‘s the old order doing everything to preserve its power.