• Artair Geal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    197
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Absolutely no surprise there. When you keep the barrier to entry low and throw in an algorithm to increase “engagement” via outrage, the soup turns to poison quickly.

    This is why every time someone says the Fediverse is “too confusing,” I just smile and nod. That attitude of petulant, lazy, self-imposed gatekeeping is what’s keeping the Fediverse a much nicer place to be.

    • GreenCrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      This this this. The fediverse being “confusing” keeps the idiots, boomers, trolls, and overall horrible people away. Having to learn something new is too much for those people. Lemmy/Mastodon and so on are “nerd” platforms, and I really like it that way.

      • Shifty McCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Easy on the boomer stuff. You just lumped “horrible people” into the same group as regular people that happen to have lived more years than you. If you are looking for a “nerd” platform, you’ll do well to remember that there are a ton of extremely nerdy boomers out there and you just helped turn the soup to poison for them

  • pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly apps like Threads and Twitter should just be a containment site for these types of people. Let them be…

  • Bingohas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Holy shit, they launched Threads pre-enshittified. Massive time saver if you ask me.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I suspect they had to jump on it when Elon shat the bed over the weekend. Suckerberg probably saw that disasterpiece and was like “quick, spit-shine the dev build and go live!”

    • Fisk400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are basically corporate accounts that are payed to be bigots online. You are looking at literal astroturf and asking why it doesn’t feel like grass.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      After over 3 decades of voting, across 3 countries, even having held beliefs all the way from what I though was “communism” (when I was little more than a kid) through neoliberalism and finally settling down to a sort of social democracy (shaped by and subservient to my principles) and having even been involved in a supposedly thinking leftwing party around here I would stay that mindless tribalism is exactly what almost the entirety of politics is nowadays.

      The whole “building your on political beliefs starting from your core principles upwards, and always keeping them in mind” thing is very unusually: normally (even in that supposedly “thinking” people party) it’s all about choosing sides, growing an emotional bond with your side and then just blindly waving the team’s flag and unskeptically take in and parrot whatever your side’s celebrities says as if they’re unchallangeable truths delivered down all the way from the gods.

      In fact I’m pretty pissed from discovering that most people in even that party of supposedly thinking people are little more than clubist political parrots. It does however explain why so many measures people parrot as the right thing to do are actually one-sided and in practice not anchored in the principles we’re told they’re suppose to promote, sometime even de facto going against them: when people are unskeptical unthinking fans of the team, they’re really easy to lead by the nose by womever captures the leadership positions on that team, an sometimes said leaders aren’t even purposefully manipulative, they’re just nowere as bright as their small-pond celebrity status makes them think and generally have ridiculously narrow life experience and hence don’t really know much about how the World works outside their tiny tiny bubble.

    • BenShapiro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am only on a platform “for something” if that “something” is AOC. Purely for professional reason.

  • lunaticneko@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 years ago

    Clusterfuck is happening!

    In my country all the influencers are announcing the same things using the same template. I wonder if it’s a subsidized or monetized shill.

  • Rhabuko@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ah I see it has already became a toxic shit hole. Need the toxic people for that sweet rage engagement.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Time and time again, it has been proven that “absolute free speech” online just attracts the absolute worst kind of people.

    I did expected them to fail immediately, but this is way funnier than I expected. They either need to start banning immediately and start throwing money at celebs to use Threads, otherwise no one mainstream will ever advertise there.

    • Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      You mean the non-heavily moderated platforms allow for discussion on topics you care about by people who disagree with you.

      • TrinityTek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Except much like your comment, they aren’t actually trying to have a good faith discussion.

    • 4z01235@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 years ago

      Twitter clone by Facebook. The worst part is they’re implementing ActivityPub and will federate with Lemmy and Mastodon instances.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yeah, seriously, meta has nothing worthwhile to offer. And if they buy something worthwhile, it will stop being worthwhile.

      • Pohl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        Will they though? From what I can tell, Mastodon/lemmy users would get ad free access to threads content without turning over any personal data. If I’m not off base on that, that seems like a thing that meta is going to avoid.

        I don’t want trash from meta crowding up the place and would probably leave a server that federated with threads but I am pretty sure that’s never going to happen.

  • MrCenny@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have locked this post because of comments deviating from the main topic.

  • Ben@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    ROFLMAO some people say it’s sad.

    What’s sad is that people even noticed it.