Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) is proposing two amendments to an appropriations bill that would defund the various prosecutions of former President Trump.

He is adding to the defense of the former president mounted by Trump allies in the House as they circle the wagons in the face of four indictments.

Clyde, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, on Monday announced plans for two amendments to the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) fiscal 2024 appropriations bill that would “prohibit the use of federal funding for the prosecution of any major presidential candidate prior to the upcoming presidential election on November 5th, 2024,” according to a press release.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dems:

    • Benghazi This is stupid, but we’ll sit through all these dumb ass hearings and waste money to appease these shitheads
    • Hunter Biden This is stupid, but we’ll sit through all these dumb ass hearings and waste money to appease these shitheads
    • Whitewater This is stupid, but we’ll sit through all these dumb ass hearings and waste money to appease these shitheads
    • And so on

    Republicans:

    • Any charge POLITICAL WITCHUNT!! STOP THE PROCESS! OVERTHROW THE GOV’T!!
    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exercising regular congressional powers by introducing legislation that cuts funding to a judicial body, regardless of the intent, isn’t obstruction of justice.

      • RavenFellBlade@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        When your sole purpose is to use extrajudicial force to subvert justice, how on earth is that not obstruction? Congress doesn’t have unilateral authority to undermine the law for their own gain.

  • detalferous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It sounds like an effort to obstruct justice in furtherance of an indicted criminal enterprise.

  • iHUNTcriminals@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How does everyone healthily cope with all this modern day political stuff?

    It feels hopeless sometimes… All of it. Cost of living, social divisions, unbelievably unprofessional everything from cops to politicians, safety, mass shootings, education, jobs, jobs that pay, medications, unhealthy-food/water, weather…

    I get caught in the loop easily. And in my personal reality, yeah I have it better than a lot of people in this world… But it’s like it doesn’t mean anything because in this culture I feel like …cut off from soul and the essence of what life is.

    • ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Revolutionary optimism. The contradictions are intensifying and the system is falling into crisis. We make the world turn, and we will prevail!

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If there is a civil war, you are probably going to die in it.

        I don’t know that “revolutionary optimism” is a good solution to anything, ever.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            So long as you understand that a person given PTSD by bed bugs isn’t going to win any revolutions, were on the same page.

            I don’t care about your Doomerism.

            • ImmortanStalin@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Quite the opposite of doomerism.

              The bed bug battle was ultimately won if you want a follow up after finding nothing of value to reference in my post history.

              ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m somewhat amazed we don’t have any “conflict of interest” laws that say “This is clearly corrupt when you’re making laws to attack ongoing judicial activities”