How do you weigh a Don’t Want with Want Most? A 0.1 weighting is much more useful than a negative weighting. And it is rightfully phrased so.

Such a chatbot exists already. There are numerous sexting games on the app store capitalizing this. You can make the chatbot in AI town into sexting as well.

TikTok’s algorithm. It does a lot of things against modern morals but people inherently like them. It is not inclusive and pro-erotic. And ease of use too. Plus state funded money.

The difference is in the user demographic. You can’t have an algorithm to satisfy both the YouTube audience and the TikTok audience.

Because Israel’s interest doesn’t align with the US perfectly?

And the family of the hostages can kill whoever they want to “in revenge”? You guys really have twisted morals.

Removed by mod

United States, making money in wars, always.

Lock the surrounding borders and let them fight to death for generations. Nothing would work to stop religious war. We can only contain the damage. Aiding either sides or anyone would prolong the war. Even child care and education should not be provided, we have tried and school became soldiers’ training grounds. None of the participating countries are worth helping anyways.

Firefox is somehow struggling at picking up feedback from users and Safari is not open source.

We need much more competition on every front. The VPN market is the only place where competition exists, even though it is narrowed with fake competitions.

Things could change if Linux distro becomes the majority system in PC, notebook and mobile markets. The PC market is shifting thanks to Windows 11 system requirements. The mobile market tho.

Do we have tab groups yet?

Which country is getting the best development under the Belt and Road initiative?

Imagine not knowing this already. Ask any Weibo users to repost anything from the western media. Learn their fear.

M$‘s priority is to draw new people on their products and make people upgrade to higher tiers. Existing users are none of their concern. There are business models who will put the product team to focus on existing users. One way is an open source product run by the users community, another way is product relying on the effect of word of mouth.

Sadly not under the cold war we are having right now.

You can view and contribute, so do all the help possible but you can’t modify/rebuild/release a different version. That is not open source, that is called open to volunteer.

Open hardware is not something sustainable. Hardware does not enjoy the benefit of open source software.

Open projects inside the 3D printing community might be possible but anything requires heavier R&D would not work.

Ot let people opt-in if it is truly something great to have. Why put something on one wants there to “let people turn it off”?

That’s a bit slippery, but they sure are abusing our trust in the brand for this one.