• son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t use the apps on my smart TV because I have a separate streaming device and I don’t trust that the smart TV apps will be updated properly.

  • golamas1999@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Any smart home stuff. The story with Amazon shutting down someone’s account and all their devices is terrifying. Frankly I should probably unplug my smart speakers.

    The Apple Watch is neat for health stuff but I don’t see a need for another device to charge.

    OLED and Mini/MicroLED screens for PWM sensitivity. Even LED lights are starting to hurt my head.

    VR/AR is just Ready Player One stuff.

    • neekz0r@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you are willing to put in a fair amount of effort, you can have a smart home without accounts anywhere.

      Most of the account based stuff is based upon open specs.

      But you have to be somewhat technical and patient.

    • OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The health stuff is a bit overblown anyway. On a day to day level it’s just junk data.

      There’s so much variation between both between people and also for one person just depending on how they feel that you can’t tell what a particular number means.

      There’s some argument that heart rate is useful for high-end cardio, where you want to keep track of exactly which heart rate band you’re in to be sure that you’re at capacity but still clearing all the lactate from your system. However, given how much these numbers can vary if you haven’t slept fully or you have a bit of a cold, or you overate, you’re probably better off learning to pace yourself.

    • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The health stuff on the Apple Watch is basically just for entertainment at this point. Which isn’t to say it can’t be useful, I definitely know people who have gotten more active because of the “gamification” of things like the activity rings.

      If your watch reports say, a single atrial fibrillation event in any otherwise healthy individual, it doesn’t do a whole lot for you. Even if you bring that information to your doctor, they can’t be expected to do much with it. They could strap some additional monitors on you, but if it is a very rare event there isn’t much chance of it recurring when they are actively looking at it. In some cases, the anxiety caused by worrying about it can actually cause more issues than just not knowing.

      I actually like my watch a lot, but more for just a notification device/convenient payment interface rather than a health tracker.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Smart watches.

    I do not need an additional notification screen. I see 0 benefits

    • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      I sent my bother a text the other day. I got upset that he didn’t immediately respond, because I knew he had a smart watch.

      I realized that I was getting upset for a condition neither of us set. I eventually heard from him and his watch didn’t really matter.

      I also think the health monitoring is kinda creepy.

    • 99nights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I love my smart watch for checking a notification that I can’t pull my phone out to check as my hands are usually wet and gross from my profession so it only makes sense to me.

      Also, they work great as fitness trackers these days too, if you’re into that kind of thing otherwise a mechanical watch will work perfectly fine.

    • travirGT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I needed to keep track of the time and I don’t always have my phone on me so I got a mechanical watch instead. It’s great! No having to charge it, no chance of it tracking me and I got a new hobby/interest out of it.

  • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Most social media.

    I used to use reddit, I have moved all my presence over here. That’s about it.
    I have a FB Messenger account because that is how a lot of my family keeps in touch with me, and I have this. I had a proper FB account back when I was in uni and Facebook was still only for uni students, but I think I dropped it shortly after that.

    It’s not some grand principled stance, I just don’t get most of them because I am apparently an old man. Like Instagram, why do I want to share pictures with just random people? How am I networking with anybody by doing so? I honestly don’t get why it is so popular.

    • 99nights@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same. Except I still occasionally use reddit, just not as much as I used to.

      I only use FB messenger as it’s big here for communication and FB to post photos of my kids for my family to see which has only been recently, since I had kids. Before that I didn’t even touch FB.

      Other than that, social media doesn’t interest me at all.

  • Saltarello@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago
    • Google/Apple/Samsung pay. They’ve had enough data over the years without knowing my banking habits.
    • Alexa/smart speakers. Always listening device in the house? No thanks
    • Smart doorbell. I don’t want to send data directly to whoever Amazon wants to share it with yet I can’t avoid being recorded whilst walking the dogs round the neighbourhood
    • AI. Nervous about where this is heading
  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Facebook, Twitter and now Threads. Have no interest and zero use for that stuff.

    Self driving cars or honestly the majority of car tech introduced in the last 5 years or so, such a lane keeping assist or other drivers “aids” which ultimately seem to distract drivers more than ever help them.

    • mortrek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Only thing I left on in my newish car is the lane change/blind spot warning and the “you are about to ram someone” alarm. Can’t remember the official names. They rarely actually help, but when they do, it can mean avoiding a collision.

      • shiroininja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        the blind spot detector is a game changer for SUVs and other vehicles with limited visibility. I don’t feel safe without it anymore.

      • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I drive a 2006 Corolla.

        How bad are you at driving that you need a computer to let you know when you need to pay attention?

        • mortrek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Lol that’s rude. I drove a 94 Corolla for like 20 years. Regardless of what an expert driver like you thinks, these sort of safety features are useful. Not often, and usually one would notice the issue without them and avoid a collision, but there’s that occasional situation where they can save your life.

          • flucksy_bango@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m sorry for being rude. I must have been in a bad mood.

            I’m not an expert driver, just a careful one. I’ve never had any driver assistance at all and don’t really see the need for them unless you’re distracted while driving.

            Like, the only way they’d save my life is if they could avoid a front end collision, getting t-boned, or rear ended. They just seem annoying to me.

    • philpo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It depends how you use car assistance devices. It you drink Musk’s cooldaid about the autopilot it’s bullshit. People who use these technologies to do something else/let them get distracted are idiots and tbh, should be punished severely.

      But there is ample scientific data that e.g. radar based speed control/adaptive cruise control does reduce injury rates as it let people stay focused for longer as less concentration is used.

      Basically you have a (individual )envelope of concentration/focus that you can stay reasonably focused. The time limit how long you can do so is influenced by ones general mental condition, experience, individual constitution on that day, driving circumstances, time, etc. On average it is around 2.5h.

      With well designed assistance systems this period can be prolonged by up to 1h, 45min on average and cases where we have a bad day profit more. And as we are all idiots who think we can drive 4h/5h/6h/+X straight the time we are not concentrated enough is reduced significantly.

      And of course there are pure security oriented systems that simply do things better than humans - automatic obstacle recognition and breaking systems are a good example. There is literally a kid not being injured or dead because my car has one (as it is the European law by now) - crossed a inner city street without looking, between two large vans parked on the side… No chance to see the kid. And even with 30km/h a full front collision can kill. The car was brought to a full stop before I even recognised what happend.

      Source: one of my best friends is a researcher on that topic for a major university.

  • Teknikal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Does Facebook count because I was once in trouble with the police here for something completely unrelated to the Internet and they asked me several times for my Facebook account which didn’t exist anyway

    Made me think they were fishing for anything and anything they read on there would have likely ended up twisted against me.

    So yeah I refuse to use it.

  • Haldum96@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Smart watches, as I’m a big fan of mechanical watches. I don’t need my wrist to be a place for constant notifications and distractions.

    • entertainmeonly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Most smart watches go too far but I love my Garmin Instinct. It feels like a modern digital. Just enough cool tools and features but still black and white. With the o2 sensor on it lasts nearly two weeks, a month with it off, before it needs charging. I can track hikes and bikes. Gives me exact coordinates with a push of a button and no subscription or additional monthly fees to use it. If I could afford a mechanical watch for the price I paid for my Garmin ($130 used) maybe I’d own one.

    • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have only very recently come around on that. When voice commands first came out, they were absolute garbage. I am still conditioned to never expect them to work, and am always pleasantly surprised when they do.

      To be fair, I largely only use them for things like setting my alarm, because I still have an engrained expectation that they won’t work otherwise.

      • Bageler@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Voice typing is a game changer if you break a hand. I did a semester of college writing several essays a week with 99% voice typing.

  • Gogo Sempai@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Smart Watches.

    1. I don’t want to take care of charging for yet another device. Plus, analog watches are beautiful!

    2. Already trying to limit my screen time, no reason to check notifications the instant they pop.

    3. Don’t want to be conscious of my heart rate and sleep schedule all the time. Also have some privacy concerns about real time data associated with me making its way into big tech’s servers.

  • RomanRoy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Home smart devices in general. I’m avoiding Alexa, Siri or any other thing like that. Besides the obvious privacy issues I see about them, I can only imagine being alone at home, Alexa thinking something talked to her and responding in a distorted voice. No, thanks.

    I’m considering a home assistant at some point, by setting up a proper network for the smart devices alone, but that’s as far as I’ll go.

  • ttk@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Generative AI. Dall-E just produces dumb images. ChatGPT is absolutely useless, nothing more than some kind of novelty toy. The fact that people are asking it questions and believing it is just so plain stupid. And if i need to do research to be able if it just talks bullshit again - why bother asking it in the first place?

  • sweet@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    for all the people saying smart devices/homes, you all should check out rhasspy/piper on github. It by itself is a TTS system but it’s integrated into an offline smart-home system and a few other projects in the same vein. The links are on their git page and its pretty damn interesting. I personally use it for audiobooks after training my own voice but a lot of people want an amazon/google alternative. I may or may not have just trained a model on the same voice that amzn uses lol.