In this scenario, we aren’t trapped in the dome. There are openings and doors, so we can get out, cycle in fresh air, etc.

Is this a viable solution to way to avoid the effects of climate change? Would it be cooler in the dome? Would there be any negative repercussions? Would clouds form inside the dome? Could it rain in the dome? Would the rain be more toxic than usual because car fumes wouldn’t dilute as well? Could outside lightning break the dome if it got struck? Would there be a single point in the dome that the sunlight would be directed to that everyone would just have to avoid, else they just burst into flame?

Sorry but I have so many questions about this. Apparently there was a show about the situation, but all I remember is that it wasn’t very good. Hank from Breaking Bad was in it.

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 years ago

    So instead of letting all our methane and CO2 escape into our atmosphere, you want to check notes create a bubble filled with farts and car emissions that can never escape?

  • Phantom_Engineer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty sure this would make things worse. The dome would block out the jet stream making any rain minimal, and, even if tinted, the dome might actually focus the sun’s energy on the city.

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yeah, it would definitely rain inside the dome.

    Source: my dad. He was in the Air Force, and once worked in a giant aircraft hangar that was big enough to accommodate an airship. He told me that the hangar had its own “weather”, and conditions inside the hangar were announced like weather forecasts.

    That was only one hangar. Even though it was uncommonly large, it wasn’t nearly as big a city block.

    On an unrelated note, I wonder how long it would take the inside of the dome to get filthy from things like exhaust.

  • Lumberjacked@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it was in SuperFreakanomics where they explored the viability of releasing the equivalent to volcano smoke into the atmosphere to shade the earth. The research was based on earth cooling after certain types of volcano eruptions.

    I think the scientist conclusion was that it was pretty viable but introduces way too many other issues. The biggest being, who gets to control the earth thermostat.

  • Pro75357@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    There are probably better ways to block out the sun. Glass is heavy and would cause a lot of problems. Something that floats high in the sky would be better, but it would unfortunately move with the wind and weather. If you could get something big enough to space, in a geosynchronous orbit, it just might work…

  • scytale@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like this will just accelerate warming even more, just even more concentrated. You’re basically making smaller greenhouse effect situations instead of the entire planet.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’ve heard of the greenhouse effect right? And how it’s named after greenhouses? You know what a greenhouse is? A glass building.

    Those domes would be like ovens inside.