• sour@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    How would you do that so it isn’t ugly as hell and isn’t prone to misunderstanding?

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      How would you do that so it isn’t ugly as hell

      same way we do with lights now, design them attractively. It is not always successful and that’s on the manufacturers.

      and isn’t prone to misunderstanding?

      what about it is confusing? green = not coming at you so it’s okay to turn left (or whatever).

          • sour@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Red is always on top (at least in Europe) so even color blind people know what the signal is.

            • Trashboat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Same here in the US, though I’ll say as someone actually colorblind, it’s not the easiest to decipher the red/yellow when at speed until you’re somewhat close. Normally not an issue since anything resembling red=start slowing down, but there are situations where a standard light may start acting as a single flashing red or yellow, and that can be tough to figure out at speed. Flashing reds are supposed to have stops signs here as far as I know, but there’s been at least one intersection that hasn’t had them, which certainly gives me some anxiety about taking that as a rule. The system works alright enough, but it’s definitely frustrating that we settled on red/green for things when that’s the most common color blindness. I have some strong opinions on bathroom indicators, particularly in airport bathrooms where the lighting is often sub par too

      • sour@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        How would that work? If you look from the side you suddenly don’t see anything again, or an arrow point forwards or backwards?

        If you look from the front, current turn signals work for that already.

        • Oneshot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          sliding lights: it depends on the bulb but i imagine it would easy to see move

          arrows: i dont know why you think they would point fowards or backwards they would just towards the side youre on or not

          • sour@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you’re looking at the side of the car, you don’t see them the same way as from the front. Which this whole discussion is about.

            If you can see both turn signals from your point of view, current design works well enough.

              • sour@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I know how flow lights work. But they still don’t help you see better that a car is turning away from you, which is what this discussion is about.

                Imagine a crossroad where a car is coming from your right side. You have no way of knowing whether they turn right or go straight, regardless of the way the lights work, because you won’t see them.

                  • sour@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    20 hours ago

                    And then they’d flash no matter which direction they’d turn?

                    So basically hazard lights all the time? Not sure if you still don’t understand what this discussion is about and how I could make it any more clear.