• Grenfur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      What’s funny to me here is that, as a long time Arch user, I have been considering switching to NixOS. One of the most terrifying thoughts to me is that after using the same Arch install for 2 years I will spend ages trying to recreate it if I ever have to. Oh, that and Nix letting you test packages seems like a cool feature.

      • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve been on arch around a year now and also considered the jump to NixOS. I was actually dual booting it with arch for awhile and I found pretty quickly that the shit documentation was a huge turn off for me. I ended up nuking the nix partition and reclaiming it for arch.

  • Integrate777@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    NixOS consist of a bunch of options that you define using the nix programming language. Since it’s a programming language, everything is well defined and organised into single place.

    Technically, someone could build a GUI configuration editor with sane defaults and clearly organised pages of settings, which generates a configuration for you. This could immediately change NixOS from the most tedious to a relatively easy to use distro.

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean isn’t it accepted that NixOS is a terrible pick for a beginner, especially a non-technical one? I feel like even the Nix community doesn’t recommend the distro to complete beginners.

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use Nixos BTW.

      And I can’t recommend it to anyone. Not even veterans.

      I can only say if you like souls like games nixos might be your thing…

    • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I really wish everyone thought like that, but I still see people recommending Nix, Arch, Void… and some go the ideological route and start recommending systemd-less only like Artix or ranting against anything that uses Flatpak. Those discussions can get messy, and they always alienate the person who asked. Unfortunately those with ideological reasons are always the loudest and present in basically every “Beginner’s Help” group.

      • TwilightKiddy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t recommend vanilla Arch only because of the installation process. CachyOS that simplifies it is an extremely good pick for a person who already knows what a computer is, but wants to try a proper OS.

        Arch mostly got it’s reputation in the early days. Today some things are a lot easier to do on Arch than on other distros, especially because AUR exists. Also, it built one of the best wikis over all that time.

    • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      When my win 10 gaming box EOLs this fall, I’m probably going to jump it straight to arch, since it looks like the most straightforward way to build a Steam OS like system.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does anyone really recommend Ubuntu these days? I think Mint has reigned supreme for years, at least for beginners.