• Nalivai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If we’re counting future technology, my money are on iron man style reactor. Don’t need to fuze shit, infinite energy.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Except the Ironman style reactor is pure science fiction, whereas hydrogen fusion is real, but still has issues of energy capture, which several groups are working on.

      There are two promising avenues, one is a direct physical capture, as in fusion is initiated with huge pistons that are physically moved by the fusion explosion,

      And the other cool one is direct magnetic coupling.

      I expect both to take off long before the tokamak style does.

      But fission power is already here, and much easier to set up. Molten Salt Thorium is also promising. And once some corrosion issues are solved, could power the earth at current levels for the next thousand years.

      All while producing an isotope of actinium that produces only alpha radiation. Which is super useful in killing cancer cells.

      • Nalivai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Well, they suggested fuzing gazoline, not me.

        But fission power is already here

        Asterisk. A big one. There is no real life prototypes of energy-positive reactors yet. There are several promising pre-prototypes that are almost ready, just need to fix some engineering issues. And it would not be a problem if the whole field wasn’t in this state since the sixtieth.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fission. As in uranium and Thorium.

          We’ve had energy positive fission since the 1950s.