• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    The difference is far too small to measure at these scales, the Earth would be falling toward the more massive object faster than the less massive object. Therefore the more massive object hits first.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Therefore the more massive object hits first.

      Only technically. The effect you’re describing is so minute that it’s insignificant.

      It’s like pointing out that the Great Pyramids of Giza are so massive that time moves 1 billionth slower for the surrounding objects. It’s neat that the effect is potentially measurable, but noone is going to be adjusting their clocks to account for it

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Science is built on technicalities. In an exam, if a student considered the centre of m_1 as the centre of gravity instead of the weighed centre of m_1 and m_2 they would fail. This is no different

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Your analogy doesn’t hold up, because factors get ignored in physics discussion all the time. Whem was the last time you’ve see a question in a dynamics class that didn’t ignore air resistance for the sake of simplicity?

          The effect you’re describing is orders of magnitude smaller than that. I doubt the change would even register in a double floating-point variable if you did the calculations in Matlab