• AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Why? Seems like a reasonable amount. In the boxes i used there was place for i believe 80 tips so when i had to pipet something in a 96well plate with multiple components that where not able to be mixed before i sometimes got through multiple boxes in a single session. (And yes i wish i had a digital multi pipet but even then it would not have alwqys been possible to use it.

      • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was joking, honestly. There are both multitip pipettes and experiments requiring a ridiculous amount of separate wells to be filled, both which will make a box disappear.

              • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 hours ago

                It takes the resources it takes. Can’t just go “we’re stopping doing science because it uses plastic, sorry everyone”.

                • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  19 hours ago

                  Yeah. True. I’m a programmer of those things and I make an effort to be as efficient as possible with tips, ie mixing with the same tip and compensating accuracy for it. It’s more difficult but worth the effort imo.

                  Also reuse for things like reagents makes a big difference.