• lotzenplotz@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 years ago

    This article is very thin on the details. Why would anyone want to cultivate a plant in the lab that grows perfectly well in fields across multiple climate zones?

    • nhgeek@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      2 years ago

      The final product is dried and harvested, with minimized water, land and energy use, Galy says.

      That’s why. Cotton is notoriously bad in all of those categories. To that I would add the most cotton grown commercially is paired with a lot of pesticides as well.

      • lotzenplotz@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        To make the Galy cotton, a team collects samples from a plant and harvests its cells. The cells are grown in bioreactor or fermentation vessels in a cell culture process similar to beer brewing. The final product is dried and harvested, with minimized water, land and energy use, Galy says.

        Maybe I just misread the sentence. But the full quote seems deliberately obtuse to me. They don’t explicitly say that they need less water than traditional farming.

    • whenever8186@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m not up to speed on the environmental impact of cotton farming, but it would be pretty cool if this technology could be applied to stuff like the oil palm, which only grows in tropical areas.

    • SenorBolsa@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In theory it could use far less land, water, fuel, and pesticides to achieve a similar output of a superior quality product, In theory. There’s a lot of labor resources and energy that goes into growing cotton. You could likely replace many hundreds of acres of cotton fields with a modest factory on 20 acres of land.