Many people on Lemmy despise AI with a passion, and demand storefronts provide them with the ability to exercise their prejudice against developers choosing to use AI tools during development. I think it’s silly, but if we’re going to start judging developers based on the tools they used then we should expand the concept to the full extent. For example, many people here don’t like Microsoft, and so developers should be forced to disclose whether they used Windows, Visual Studio or GitHub in development so that people can discriminate on that basis.
Personally I think Apple is the worst company in the technology industry, and I would like to be able to see which developers used Apple hardware in development so I can boycott them and make sure none of my funds are inadvertantly going to pay Apple. We’re abandoning the old practice of simply judging software based on the end product, and instead we’re scrutinizing the creation process itself, so we shouldn’t stop at just AI usage. Let’s pick apart every development decision that would otherwise be invisible to the end user.
Why stop at AI? Using a Mac is far more unethical in my view. Let’s enable people to boycott on every single possible tool used, and not focus on a single one.
Using words like “prejudice” and “discriminate” implies a moral dimension that I don’t think applies here. There’s nothing inherently immoral about disapproving of AI use or not wanting to unwittingly consume AI-generated content.
I mean by definition it’s a moral stance. Morals literally by definition just mean the belief of what is right or wrong.
It’s basically impossible for any stance to not be a moral one on nearly everything. Prejudice and discrimination are entirely the correct words here.
The problem is the way people typically use these words makes it feel wrong to use them in this context in this fashion.
So despite them being technically correct. They feel wrong.
Thank you. They seem the right words to me, too, but I’m always open to alternatives in using the right words as I make a sincere effort to be exact in my vernacular.
They’re accurate by dictionary definition. Care to make alternative suggestions so I can improve the accuracy of my analogies?