It isn’t that surprising but it is somewhat surprising.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    23 days ago

    fediverse, decentralized group of social media platforms in which each independent platform can interact freely with any other platform that is part of the group.

    Great that they have an article on it, though their formatting the start of each article like a dictionary entry is a bit odd compared to Wikipedia.

    If it were a Wikipedia article, it would probably need some copyediting to give it a more encyclopedic tone along with in-line citations.

    • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      Tbh I never understood the Lemmy users can interact with all other platforms that share the same protocol.

      It’s not like I can view a Mastodon user’s history on Lemny, right?

      • INeedMana@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Lemmy and history, no. On Lemmy you can see comments from Mastodon and posts (toot with a Lemmy community pinged inside. Which is rarely done but happens). But not the toots themselves
        Piefed now allows to directly follow accounts (similar to Mastodon, Friendica, etc) and you can start getting the new toots after following an account https://piefed.zip/c/microblogs

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Meta’s Threads is also working toward ActivityPub compatibility, which would significantly expand the fediverse user base.

    Um… fuck no, please and thank you!

    • CombatWombat@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      The bad news is: you can already follow accounts bidirectionally between Threads and Mastodon. The good news is: Meta did the bare minimum and seems to have stopped development.

      • Jupiter Rowland@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        Also, Threads has introduced extremely strict rules for servers that want to federate.

        Entire Fediverse server applications are incapable of following all these rules, either technologically or by concept.

        For example, IIRC, Threads demanded a full public timeline. Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte do have that feature in code. But it’s intentionally turned off server-wide by default, and there’s a very good reason for this and for just about no serious admins of public servers ever turning it on.

        • Rose@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Threads has introduced extremely strict rules for servers that want to federate.

          That’s hilarious, considering just as soon as this whole Threads fediverse integration project was announced, a whole bunch of prominent fediverse hosts joined up and blocked them en masse. Like, fuck it, we’re not talking to Facebook, nope nope nope. (Turbo Based.) (Check your Mastodon instance. Chances are they’re still blocking threads.net.)