I saw a toot from someone who was searching for Iocaine and only wanted to partake in discussion involving Iocaine.

  • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    A fictional poison from The Princess Bride, and possibly some small tech projects inspired by the same.

  • keisatsu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s software for trapping AI scrapers. They get served paragraphs of gibberish created from public domain works which keeps them occupied and potentially poisons them. It’s very cheap for the backend to run.

    • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ah I was wondering if you’d find this thread. Looking into it now its no doubt a cool project when searching previously I kept running into articles about princess bride.

      Unfortunately I have nothing to host on the internet but I wonder it could be paired with something that traps the clanker in the maze with a proof of work in between each page. That way they are ingesting poison and working for it. I get a lot of joy from the idea of a swarm of bots stuck in an infinite maze.

      Thank you for creating Iocaine.

      • algernon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Ah I was wondering if you’d find this thread

        I did! It was lucky I found it so soon, I usually do a search once or twice a week - and it just happened I did one of those yesterday.

        previously I kept running into articles about princess bride

        That’s normal, iocaine’s name is from the Princess Bride, after all - and the book and the film are much better known than my software (as they should be).

        Unfortunately I have nothing to host on the internet but I wonder it could be paired with something that traps the clanker in the maze with a proof of work in between each page. That way they are ingesting poison and working for it. I get a lot of joy from the idea of a swarm of bots stuck in an infinite maze.

        The ingested poison doesn’t do much, it’ll get discarded before training. So if you have nothing to put behind iocaine, I don’t think it’s worth it to run it. It can generate endless amounts of garbage, yeah, and will tie up some crawler resources too, yup, but it also costs you bandwidth and CPU & RAM you otherwise wouldn’t need to spend (since there’s nothing behind it, there’s no “more expensive” endpoint iocaine is taking a hit for). I don’t think that’s a good trade. As for Proof of Work: most bots won’t bother, and for the few that do… the cost/benefit ratio is still bad if there’s nothing behind iocaine.

        • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I wonder if you’ve put any thought into this. I’m just.a layman.

          So we assume the ingested data is accepted by ai company but its filtered for legitimacy. Is that human or AI. Either way that had to be bypassed I’m not sure how big of a block of text they analyses but the coherent text needs to exceed this and the web context needs to some how reinforce this.

          Is this possible?

          • algernon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Is that human or AI.

            As far as I know, it’s mostly incredibly underpaid human labor.

            Is this possible?

            Possible? Most certainly. The trouble is, we have absolutely no way to know, so the best we can do is… guess, hope, and pray. Preparing even one page of plausible looking text is hard - there’s a reason LLMs require powerful GPUs. Generating an infinite amount of plausible looking pages is even harder. That’s why I believe it is not worth the effort to poison them - it costs too much on our side, and we can’t verify if it works.

            On top of that, the more plausible it looks, the more likely it is to lead a human visitor astray, should they accidentally find themselves in the maze. Right now, if a human looks at the iocaine output, it is clearly garbage. The bots don’t care, and the programs and/or people who need to verify it, will either have to go through a massive trove of junk, or throw away everything scraped from the entire domain (in both cases, mission accomplished: LLMs didn’t get to the juicy data they wanted).

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah I was like “isn’t that the stuff they get from the drug store to turn into cocaine in A Scanner Darkly?”

      But no I think they called that “solarcaine” if I recall correctly