• coffeekomrade@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 years ago

    It would be cool if these YouTubers could wait til the paper was peer reviewed and its results replicated before shooting their mouth off

  • OttoVonGoon@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 years ago

    For people put off by the shitty title, the video is actually really good and comprehensive, and sets realistic expectations. It’s a shame that these garbage clickbaity titles are a thing.

      • OttoVonGoon@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agreed! If it lets people like this guy make videos like this, a little clickbait isn’t so bad. I just wish they’d phrase titles slightly differently, like “THIS COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING” would still draw eyes without being a lie.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I found the arxiv papers more interesting, but it’s not a bad divulgation video.

  • anlumo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    We get one of those about once a year, and none of them have been replicated yet.

      • anlumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Then we should build a huge battery right there in their lab and let it store energy for the whole world.

      • bluGill@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Did it even work in the lab? Replication is needed, otherwise they might have had something else happen. For that matter even if it really happened, if it can’t be duplicated it changes nothing

    • Thembo McBembo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      I recommend looking at the summary on Wikipedia. See the “Response” and “Publication History” sections: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LK-99#Publication_history

      Similar research has been falsified, the third author of this paper left the university months ago, some authors filed patents on the material years in advance, and the underlying mechanisms haven’t been thoroughly explained.

      However, they presented it in a way that is EXTREMELY straightforward to reproduce. There’s even a live stream on Twitch of someone working on it: https://www.twitch.tv/andrewmccalip So I doubt they’d make a claim that large when it’s so easy to disprove, and we’ll know for sure in a matter of days, most likely.

  • Rentlar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    This discovery has potential. At least it’s not a totally exotic process to make this LK-99. I bet more researchers are going to jump on it and explore how it will work and where its limitations are.

    The click-baityness is a little off-putting about this video. This doesn’t solve everything, but it’s possibly a big leap in the field of superconductors.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      But the guy who put lead into gasoline proved how it wasn’t poisonous, even washed his bare hands in it! (then died from totally unrelated lead poisoning)