• jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    This is really cool. I install extensions to remove the Activities button and display a workspace indicator.

    A lot of Workspaces might present a problem though. Currently, the Workspace indicator extension with collapse into a number after 8, or so, and I’m not sure how that scenario would work with the proposal.

  • s20@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well, I’m trying it out and I gotta say… I just don’t care.

    I mean, it looks nice, and I guess the extra info is good. On the other hand, I weirdly miss the word in the corner. On the other, other hand, it’s such a small change I can’t imagine getting upset about it if it became the default.

    So… Yeah. Whatever’s clever, Gnome team. I’m happy either way.

    • GenBlob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m using it now and I feel the same way. It makes more sense to have a workspace indicator but I’m so used to the activities text at the top left that it just feels weird. I don’t care if they change it it’s just weird not having it after seeing it for 6 years

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      On the other, other hand, it’s such a small change I can’t imagine getting upset about it if it became the default.

      Haha, more folks should have this attitude.

      • s20@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I agree. I saw someone said something along the lines of “kill it with fire” an all I could thing was that sounds like a lot of effort for a couple dots in a corner.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Configurability is the answer. Some people like it some don’t, just have a setting to turn it off and it’s fine

    Personally I don’t see much point in it as I just use the three finger swipe anyway, too much effort to mouse up to the top left and click it then navigate a GUI compared to just swiping left and right

    • s20@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Read the article?

      Basically, it replaces the word “Activities” with dots representing your workspaces, with the one you’re on being a pill-shape. So if you had three active workspaces and you were looking at the third one it’d be kinda like this:

      O O (__)

      It doesn’t affect the button itself at all, just changes the visual.

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    2 years ago

    Still a piece of garbage. Can’t they simply admit they were wrong and add a permanent panel with icons (like Windows or Mac) at the bottom of the screen and move on?

    • TiffyBelle@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      Eh, I used to think this way until I actually tried GNOME for a bit. I’ve grown quite fond of its workflow. There’s definitely extensions that I feel I need for it to be fully usable from my perspective, but in some ways I see it as a positive to start out with a good foundation and then allow users to extend the functionality they feel they need onto that base. Not every user is going to want the same thing, so keeping the core minimalist makes sense.

      If I wanted something like Windows, I’d use KDE. If I really wanted a GNOME Windows-like experience similar to the old GNOME2 behavior I’d use something like MATE or Cinnamon. I guess my point is that there’s plenty of DEs out there that are essentially copies of the same workflow. I respect the desire to innovate in GNOME3.

      • Qvest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m guessing everyone who likes GNOME (me included) only uses it because of its unique workflow. And that’s exactly why people were hesitant by GNOME 3 (besides the UI. I’m not a linux user from that time but damn the UI was weird seeing some old screenshots)

        • SpongeBorgCubePants@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          @MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

          is it that unique?

          For me it just strikes a nice balance between a full tiler and a classic desktop UI.

          And in my book, you don’t even need any extensions, the core product is fine as it is.

    • Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I can’t agree as I love Gnome and now feel lost when I have to use windows or MacOs. The way it uses the workspace and the way your screen isn’t cluttered with informations is great for someone like me.

      And extensions are there to help you with almost every limitation you encounter.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Again, extensions aren’t as polished as built in stuff. A prime example of this was when they ditched desktop icons, the extensions that followed fail sometimes.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dash to panel/dock + Arc Menu? ;)

      I know it’s contentious but for laptops and limited size displays I love the GNOME layout over KDE. Gestures are also way better, even on X11.

      It does everything MacOS was trying to do, but executes it way better. I say this as someone who uses MacOS daily for work.

      It has some pain points but there’s a reason it’s such a large part of the Linux ecosystem