• crow@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 years ago

    Since it already worked with instagram, this was people signing in with their instagram account, checking the app once or twice, and then going back to instagram. The starting numbers where incredibly manipulated because of this single account system between threads and instagram.

  • unix_joe@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a worse Mastodon, run by a company that celebrated election misinformation, leading to the storming of the Capitol, and who later helped police arrest a woman for abortion by turning over private messages she sent to another party. I hope it fails.

  • CreativeTensors@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean if you pay attention most social media inundated with influencers and companies is basically:

    “Buy this, no buy this, buy this instead, spend your money here!” It even leeches into everyday conversations outside of social media.

    Pay attention to how often people talk about buying things and newly released products. Hell, I’ve caught myself contributing to it. It’s kind of gross when you realize how steeped in consumerism nearly everything has become.

  • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not sure why anyone wanted a second twitter that’s still made by a big-tech

      • DarkGamer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I don’t understand why someone would choose threads over mastadon, where they could have all the dunking with none of the enshittening.

        • prd@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s still too complicated for the layperson to have to navigate. Anything beyond “I have one login at one site that everyone else has” is too much for most.

          • Chahk@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s a mix between heard mentally (well, all my friends are on it) and FOMO (what are they saying about me over there?)

            • acastcandream@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yeah, that’s basically it. Except I wouldn’t describe FOMO is “what are they saying about me over there?“ FOMO is more the fear of missing out on a shared experience. but yeah, herd mentality and FOMO, that sounds about right. 

        • Moohamin12@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nobody chose threads. It just got shoved down their throats.

          Also, Mastadon doesn’t have the same marketing these companies do.

    • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d be keen to give it a go if it were legitimately anyone else besides Facebook. Would have even tried it if Microsoft made a random Twitter clone

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, shareholders, employees and advertisers, wanted it to make money on the users. Even if only 5% users remain, that’s still better than the current interest rates after investment fund’s fees.

      Facebook/Instagram users wanted to check it out, because why not, creating an account was just a couple clicks.

      Everyone else… they didn’t, and from the looks of it, they still don’t.

  • virtualfiber@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    damn, reading the data collected from the Play Store made me finally delete my instagram account. the damn app is a free farm of data. fuck zuck

  • sculd@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    A lot of people tried it out the first few days. Didn’t found the function they need and left.

    Probably a lot will go back if its fully functional. Honestly cannot believe a Twitter alternative did not launch with chronological feed…

  • Fester@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    I like how they made the logo look like it says “ADS” throughout.

  • Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s just companies and influencers, nobody else is posting much there. And half of the influencers are only there to try to get you to follow them somewhere else. (feed is absolutely crammed with Taylor “not wearing a mask outdoors in 2023 is literally genocide” Lorenz hawking her new YouTube channel and I don’t even follow her)

    Meanwhile Mastodon continues growing steadily, and I’m getting as much engagement there as I ever did on Twitter with maybe 10% as many followers.

    • BiggestBulb@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      My one big gripe with Mastadon is that images take absolutely forever to load if they have even a marginal amount of pixels. I scroll art often and I’m left waiting for greater than a minute for these things to load (and I’m on a very, very fast connection).

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Could be the trough of dissolutionment or the trough of oblivion from which there is no return. Probably too early to tell.

  • uplusion23@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly not that big of a deal. When something is hyped up users who either didn’t or barely used Twitter (X) probably joined in. It boosted their initial numbers but again they fell off. They’ll grow as unique content grows. That happens with everything, as will the case be with Lemmy. Growth isn’t linear.

    • whelmer@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I suppose it isn’t linear but I suspect going from massive insane explosion in numbers to an 80% loss in a matter of weeks is pretty unusual. I think that growth was largely driven not by hype but by the automatic linking with other Zuckernedia properties.