• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    San Francisco’s police and fire departments have urged the CPUC to oppose the expansion – they say they’ve tallied 55 incidents where self-driving cars have got in the way of rescue operations in just the last six months. The incidents include running through yellow emergency tape, blocking firehouse driveways and refusing to move for first responders.

    I’d be curious to see how that compared to the number of idiot human drivers who got in the way and otherwise reacted incorrectly to emergency vehicles.

  • Rentlar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Just have them be overridden with a key like Elevators. Let policemen and other responders be able to drive, stop or direct them by inserting the fireman’s key.

    Or alternatively, just take full liberty and bash the autonomous vehicle out of the way. No key required.

    • oldGregg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hell yeah and then we can get a universal remote from the dank web and have free cars literally everywhere I’m down.

      • Rentlar@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It doesn’t necessarily have to be a get-free-car feature. It could be limited to 20km/h or something if operated in control mode.

    • Seathru@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      We already have the tech to let signal lights at intersections know emergency vehicles are approaching so they can direct traffic accordingly. No reason this couldn’t be adopted to autonomous vehicles.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Let policemen and other responders be able to drive, stop or direct them by inserting the fireman’s key.

      Then they can be remote-controlled by criminals to abduct people. That doesn’t seem wise.

  • garrett@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Stupid idea that’s clearly motivated by the city’s deference to their tech gentry. Self driving anything has too many questions and issues still. I’m also not inclined to table “well what about the problems with people driving?” That only tells me we need transit, not robo taxis.

    • TQuid@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ding ding ding! We have a safe mode of robot transit: trains. See, we know exactly where they will go because they run on rails. Literally.

      • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Trains aren’t safe. They just expose you to different dangers, like airborne diseases, pickpocketing, and stabbing.

        • garrett@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I promise I’m not trying to make fun of you but this sounds a bit like a suburban person’s perception of the city rather than what the city is actually like. None of this is more common on a subway than anywhere else.