I’m fairly new and don’t 100% understand it yet, but instances are run on servers that require money. Are we heading towards seeing ads or subscriptions to raise funds instead of relying on donations to cover overhead?

Especially with the influx of new users. Hardware upgrades are needed.

  • albertye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    The fediverse is the coolest thing that could happened, freedom is what all people should seek for, creating their own spaces and not supporting corporations that only want to make money out of people’s lives, data, attention, mental health, etc …

    It’s better to support the instance you are in with donations for sure.

  • irkli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    No insult intended but as you say, new here, rtfm a while before complaining.

    Yeah, it is a good idea for you to pay. How’s two bucks s month sound? No ads, no tracking, no personal data theft, the ability to change instances if the one you’re on goes fascist/corporate/whatever you dislike. Code you could actually modify.

    No CEO whims, no need for “growth” I’m that ever increasing destruction mode.

    It’s different than corporate media. Those of us old enough remember the early internet and beyond, bbsing. This fedi shit is the good shit. Adapt! It’s pretty fkn great.

    Lol it’s sucks now! Lol from the hyuuge influx of new people, new code, changes and a taste of chaos. I love this.

    CHANGE IS GOOD!

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    If we’re talking the fediverse in general, I believe Zuckerberg is launching his twitter clone very soon and it has ActivityPub integration.

    • sqibkw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s very concerning! Sounds eerily similar to how Google killed XMPP back in the day. Honestly we probably shouldn’t allow any federation with them to stay safe.

      There was a really good writeup I saw recently either here in Lemmy or on Hacker News somewhere, can’t seem to find it. In short though, Google adopted the decentralized standard, built it into Gmail so everyone uses their client, then eventually dropped support for talking with other XMPP clients.

  • Cleveland Rock@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    Open-source projects have always been sustainable by donations. Just look at Wikipedia; it’s been around for 22 years. Linux has been around for even longer.

    If lemmy.world ever sold out, I’d probably just move to reddthat.com. Problem solved.

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Especially how Lemmy is right now, only a small portion of users would be needed to sustainable keep an instance running. Maybe from every 1.000 users, only 1 would be willing to pay 10$ a month and it should be more than enough.

      Shit changes quickly when somebody thinks it would be a good way to start allowing video-uploads. It can get expensive fast with that amount of storage and bandwidth needed. I can see instances selling small “premium” subscriptions for videouploads. You could still host your own instance and get videouploads completely free for yourself, but if you don’t wanna go that route, it would make sense (and would be totally fair)

  • Chadarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Think of the Fediverse much more like Wikipedia than anything else. It is run in donations and volunteers. It is not for profit and for the benefit of all people.

  • fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The fediverse is not a single database or server. It’s a protocol and standard that’s distributed by design. The fediverse as a whole cannot be centrally monetized, just like email can’t be monetized. A single provider could potentially choose to try to monetize either by requiring a subscription or showing ads, exactly like email providers do, but if you ever feel like they’ve stopped providing a good service you can just switch to another instance just like you can switch to another email provider.

    Unlike a centralized service like Reddit, you’re not locked into a monopoly. Switching instances does not lock you out of the system as a whole, just like you can still receive email if you switch to another provider. With Reddit you can only access the platform through Reddit because it’s a closed source centralized monopoly.

    One thing the fediverse seems to lack as far as I can tell is a way to link accounts, like how you can set up forwarding with email, which helps you switch providers. But the protocol and standard is still being developed so maybe that’s something that can happen in the future

    • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      A point of caution:

      A large company absolutely could come in and absorb the majority of lemmy traffic and build proprietary code and features on top of the main protocol, eventually making the open source protocol obsolete and supplanting it as a paid/closed-source service. It has been done repeatedly by tech companies, and it is the main reason many people distrust Meta’s interest in joining the fediverse.

      For all the reasons you just mentioned, we should fight tooth and nail against that from happening, but we should at least be aware of the threat.

      • DarthCluck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think the email comparison is apt. We are currently in the bbs/dial-up ISP stage of the fediverse. When people had aol.com or netcom.com addresses.

        That gave way to powerful centralized services such as Hotmail or rocketmail, that had the promise of never changing your email again. We then saw Gmail become the big boy on the block with amazing technology.

        Even with these powerful entities, there were still hobbyists and corporate email.

        I predict the fediverse will follow a similar path. lemmy.world and beehaw are like the netcoms, or even the bbs’s, basically hobbyists, and Internet communists setting things up for the common good, or simply because it’s fun.

        We’re going to see instances fill up, become unstable, unreliable, etc. People will get frustrated when Lemm.ee, or their preferred instance can no longer support the volume they have attracted. We’ll see a professional service like a Hotmail that promises a forever home. You’ll likely also see vanity instances like what rocketmail offered. Given the nature of the interest based servers, we’ll likely see vanity instances come about singer than they did with email: starwars.fedi, lotr.verse, piano.lemmy, etc.

        Once corporate interests start to see value in a powerful, stable instance that can collect user data and serve targeted ads (starwars.fedi is easy to target), they will dump enough money to push out the hobbyists. The hobbyists will not go away, but they won’t be needed anymore.

        That’s when you’ll see the disruptor. Someone who comes into the space like Google did, and the fediverse will be an open protocol that is dominated by a few massive interests.

        All in all, I’m not predicting doom, just the natural course of events, which actually will be great for the fediverse. Just like I love my gmail.com account more than my hotcity.com account, I think the future of the fediverse is bright, even if corporate interests get heavily involved, and dominate the 'verse, because there will always be room for innovations, and hobbyists, and while a single company could dominate, the protocol is still open for anyone to do their own thing, and not be bound to a single company if they don’t want to be.

        • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I think this is spot on. It’s completely foreseeable that a well funded enterprise could stand up an instance that’s super robust and can handle a lot more traffic than current ones. They could, say, attract celebrities to do AMAs and handle the load. Or maybe they could create some communities that they stock with a giant amount of useful content.

          They’d do it for free, and it would just be another instance, but it would become invaluable, with more and more communities hosted there, and more and more users making it their home instance, until the owners felt they were valuable enough that they put their content behind a paywall or they start serving ads. Sure, people could just move to other instances, but the point would be that suddenly doing without them would be painful.

          But unlike Reddit or Twitter, it’s not as much as all or nothing situation, and other instances can compete in the same realm.

  • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The Fediverse SHOULD allow monetization and they don’t yet. As per Mark Bayliss:

    The problem here is that despite these large and escalating costs, a significant part of the fediverse is intrinsically hostile to anything other than charity or goodwill as a basis for running a server, due to hostility to capitalism as an abstract or just on a general point of principle regarding how web services should be funded. Any instance that runs advertisements to its users is likely to be blocked by any others purely on those grounds. Some instances have tried to introduce subscription fees for joining and have been blocked as a result. Ownership by a corporate entity or accepting funding from one is also likely to wind up with a block.

    I’m not saying to commercialize the entirety of the Fediverse but if you want it to actually compete with Twitter and Reddit and Tumblr then you need to open it up further.

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Subreddits have 10 million subscribers, I haven’t seen a Lemmy group with more than a few thousand people. I don’t know about you but I’d like Lemmy to be as rich in content and discussion as Reddit was. Unless you like social media when it’s empty of users.

  • Cyber Yuki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    That depends on how the admins decide to run their instances. After several crises and dramas, etc., I can say that those who decide to monetize eventually will; but so far people have been supporting their admins through crowdfunding.

    The really big instances are deciding to be open to Facebook in exchange for big money. A lot of folks in other instances don’t like it, and some instances have already decided to defederate from them in advance (search for the hashtag #FediPact). Yes, there’s lot of drama involved.

  • TheGeneral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I could see someone trying to sell ads on their instance. But ya I can’t imagine many people would join unless they had some other features that are better than other instances.

  • what_is_a_name@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I may be a minority. But I would gladly join a server that is paid and I get stability, but also a better stronger fight against the inevitable onslaught of shit - in return.

  • jamesoh5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think there should be some monetization. Otherwise how will people pay for the server costs. Maybe small ads placed in the platform across the fediverse?

    • GONADS125@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m donating $2 a month for Lemmy.world. It’s not much, but it adds up if enough people pitch in a dollar or two here and there.

    • Anon819450514@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      It needs to have some kind of monetization. More like voluntary buy-in. Maybe the web 3.0 could fix some of the money problem here. NFT as skin or avatar, some coin or medal to give others. A portion of the sale could go towards maintenance cost and whatnot

  • Ben@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    It IS monetized - right now by donations/crowdfunding.

    What we need is for people to be more open to supporting what they want via micro-payments, regular donations, because that’s the way to say NO to advertising which brings in virtually no income for the amount of time and bandwidth it consumes.

  • SmallAlmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    No ads, no tracking, just donations. The model proved itself when twitter went to shit and a big influx of users came to mastodon, it all worked out.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Many mastodon instances shut down. There’s always a risk that at some point the donations are not enough to sustain an instance. It could be very problematic if mods lose their communities when an instance shutdown.

      • Moohamin12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Perhaps what we need is a backup code or some kind of exportable file with all our data (subbed communities, interactions, yadda yadda) which we can port over to a new instance if necessary.

        • Matt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Mastodon does this (you can download a full backup of your entire account - although not sure about media) every 7 days, which can be imported into various other Fediverse platform accounts, depending on what they allow.

          I suspect that all Fediverse platforms worth their salt will make this a core feature.

  • slimarev92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m not sure this is necessarily a bad thing. Imagine inge a stable commercial service with high quality moderation (hopefully paid for by the operators) but with an option to follow other instances and transfer your data to another instance. That could be pretty good for drawing in people who just want something that works and refuse to leave reddit.