robocall@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前Dad has the chops to be a project manager.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up11.19Karrow-down16
arrow-up11.18Karrow-down1imageDad has the chops to be a project manager.lemmy.worldrobocall@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 年前message-square77fedilink
minus-squareRonSijm@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up49·1 年前"OS support: The latest one” is not that bad of an requirement… If they complain like “why doesn’t this work on Windows Vista, on IE8” - you can just point to the specs and say you only support the latest OS. So basically you only support the latest Nightly Build of Ubuntu, since that’s the current latest OS
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up14·edit-21 年前You don’t even need to support anything older than the last windows hot fix with requirements like that.
minus-squarelugal@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 年前Why support windows when you can argue that linux has a newer OS?
minus-squarenxdefiant@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 年前I am humbled by your chess of many D’s.
minus-squareSocsa@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 年前This is completely reasonable, but requires significant CI infrastructure
"OS support: The latest one” is not that bad of an requirement…
If they complain like “why doesn’t this work on Windows Vista, on IE8” - you can just point to the specs and say you only support the latest OS.
So basically you only support the latest Nightly Build of Ubuntu, since that’s the current latest OS
You don’t even need to support anything older than the last windows hot fix with requirements like that.
Why support windows when you can argue that linux has a newer OS?
I am humbled by your chess of many D’s.
This is completely reasonable, but requires significant CI infrastructure