Iv seen posts with people substituting rape with r@pe. Other than bypassing filters I can’t see a reason to censor just 1 letter that doesn’t actually censor the word? I see if you fully censor the word, but even still context completely ruins the censorship.

  • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Pretty sure it’s done to avoid videos/posts being removed by TikTok/Twitter/FB and the likes. For example, you can’t use or say the word “Suicide” on TikTok, that would get the video removed. So people say “Unalive” to get around that. This way, they can still talk about difficult topics without the dumb censorship.

    If you’re seeing it in places where that isn’t an issue (like Lemmy, for example) they may just be doing it out of habit.

    • EmperorGormet@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Makes sense, figured it was filter dodging. The fact it’s has made its way outside of those places is slightly annoying

    • Sami@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      There was this tiktok where a woman was talking about how her cousin was shot and killed for knocking on her neighbor’s door to get her kid’s thing and she used “unalive” to describe it. It was very jarring to hear in such a somber context. It feels very dystopian that people have to self censor for the algorithm. Same with youtube and any mentions of covid.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    When asking people, they seem to think it is “rude” to write out the word in full and consider it a confused courtesy.

    Whatever the reason, it fucks with people who have filters set to avoid certain topics or just want to skip discourse that uses rude language.

    It’s shitty and should stop.

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s really shitty for people that actually want to filter triggering stuff out of their feed.

    Putting in stupid characters doesn’t make it any less upsetting for the people it upsets, but it does force them to see it because fuck them, apparently.

    It’s a shitty, entitled thing to do, and people who do it should feel bad about themselves.

  • iRyu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I saw a post somewhere saying that changing 1 letter can prevent it from being searched for by people who just want to troll posts with that particular word

  • joshLaserbeam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    It is to get around filters on more oppressive platforms. My recommendation is if you see people self censoring themselves in places where they are free to say the words, tell them to say it!

  • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Some proprietary social media (looking at you meta) have filter, removing any sensitive topic. So if you write rape you can’t post while if you write r@pe you can.

    The ridiculous result is that a health-educator talking about sexual health and condoms will get censored while a teenager twerking in underwear won’t.

    n was talking about how her cousin was shot and killed for knocking on her neighbor’s door to get her kid’s thing and she used “unalive” to describe it. It was very jarring to hear in such a somber context. It f

  • DrQuint@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    No, you’re right, it is stupid. I have to agree it doesn’t work, since it largely fails to censor the word for those people the censor was made for. I have seen platforms that do full word censorship (like Steam) and when people post screenshots of “I ♥♥♥♥ you”, the only accomplishment isn’t making me not think of a slur - it’s actually rationalize even harder that they did say one of either Rape or Fuck, nothing else. Congrats censorship, you went from 1 slur, to 2 slurs.

    • EmperorGormet@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s what I would think but how do you tiptoe in context of really intense issues like suicide, rape, abuse? If you reference it I feel like it would trigger any bad emotions just on the topic not the specific word

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    It seems pretty useless to me. The words are obviously still legible and comprehensible, so I don’t see how it has a different effect than just typing it out all the way.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think it’s asinine. Rape is a serious subject. I find it insulting when someone “censors” the word in such a ridiculous way. Does the word “rape” make you uncomfortable? WELL, IT SHOULD. It’s sexual assault. You shouldn’t be comfortable thinking about it.

  • ECIN96@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s the same with most ways that we euphemise or censor words. It’s so pathetically redundant because everyone knows what the word is supposed.to be. You may as well have said it.