Uh no, the AI didn’t crack any problem.

The AI produced the same hypothesis that a scientist produced, one that the scientist considered his own original awesome idea.

But the truth is that science is less about producing awesome ideas and more about proving them. And AI did nothing in this regard, except to remind scientists that their original awesome ideas are often not so original.

There’s even a term scientists use when another scientist has the same idea but actually managed to do the work of proving it: “scooped”. It’s a very common occurrence. It didn’t happen here.

Yes, but that does not mean they want to be publicly traded.

There are plenty of privately held for-profit companies, for example Valve. Their business model does not involve stock prices, in fact it is impossible to buy Valve stock.

I doubt that’s their plan, since they aren’t on the stock market.

There are no commas in the text. And even under your interpretation, the US is only obligated to seek action by the UN Security Council. They have done so.

Section 4:

The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used

The US promised to seek action from the UN Security Council if Ukraine suffered or was threatened with nuclear attack.

Ukraine hasn’t suffered a nuclear attack. Even so, the US did seek action from the Security Council, but it was predictably vetoed by Russia.

The US promised they would not invade Ukraine, but they never promised they would protect Ukraine.

You can get much better rates if you are willing to lock your savings in for at least few months. Short term treasury bonds are 4-5% right now.

I don’t care if companies speculate or if they make a profit.

Nonsense. Most people who boycott products aren’t posting about it on the internet.

And I don’t know why you assume that opposing one company means you have to oppose others. People are allowed to oppose PayPal but not give a crap about eating meat.

I do, but they don’t own Coke. And my tap water comes from my tap.

I can easily avoid every company owned by PayPal.

It’s an open standard now, it doesn’t really matter that Tesla was the first. So it’s a good thing, kind of like iPhones switching to “Android charging cables”.

As if leftists care what happens to Palestinians lmao.

Yes, I’m sure this would all be very sad for Palestinians but the important thing is that Genocide Joe learned his lesson.

I’m not sure what you mean.

You seem to be starting with the assumption that market prices should reflect fundamentals, and questioning why they don’t. But why do you assume that?

“In the short-run, the stock market is a voting machine. But in the long-run, it is a weighing machine.”

You can’t ignore or eliminate either machine.

I don’t care if the market is under responsive to fundamentals. That just means some investors are exercising poor judgment by paying too much attention to irrelevant factors. It also gives an opportunity to investors with better judgment.

I’m sure that Musk hopes that “people will be pushed to buy” his products.

But so far, that plan isn’t working. In fact it’s backfiring, people are running away from his products.

If you’re a value investor then you believe that the actual value of a company depends on its current and future earnings and the market price will tend towards the actual value in the long run.

But naturally there are other factors that also influence the market price. In fact, the whole point of value investing is to find stocks that are “underpriced”. For various reasons, they are currently priced at a discount to their actual value. Those are the stocks you should buy, and you should expect their price to increase.

Conversely, for various reasons some stocks are “overpriced”, like Tesla. You should not buy those, because you expect their price to decrease in the long run.

A corollary is that value investors expect seemingly irrational price movements like we see with Tesla. If share prices perfectly reflected fundamentals, then it would be impossible to find a “good deal”.

Value investors don’t invest in Tesla, so you should not expect its share price to reflect fundamentals.

But they do invest in stocks like Coca Cola and American Express, so you should expect the share prices of those companies to better reflect fundamentals.

No, you base company value on its current and future earnings.

All that government influence is useless if people stop buying your products. And it turns out lots of people don’t want to buy products associated with Musk.