

Steve Jobs is already in hell though, he ain’t getting your money either way
Steve Jobs is already in hell though, he ain’t getting your money either way
That Wikipedia was unreliable
Talk about hidden figures…
Viva Colombia
This is an empirical question that people are baselessly speculating about from the armchair, when we’ve know the answer for years. Even the neoliberals over at The Economist think it’s a good idea.
That’s mistaking a structural problem for a personal one. Zeynep Tufekci has a great argument about why that wouldn’t work:
It’s reasonable, for example, for a corporation to ponder who would be the best CEO or COO, but it’s not reasonable for us to expect that we could take any one of those actors and replace them with another person and get dramatically different results without changing the structures, incentives and forces that shape how they and their companies act in this world.
Journalistic malpractice to repeat their “accidentally” claim without attribution or quotes
Ban surveillance advertising and help speed the demise of the site, or mandate interop and make it easy for those still on it to take their followers with them, but holy fuck bro—calling for a government to ban a communications platform for an entire continent?
You mean Brewster Kahle? Maybe a little?
Did you just invent donating to ProPublica?
Selver lives
In fact anonymous review is an important part of the scientific method, precisely because work shouldn’t be judged by its source
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Eduardo Ballerini reading Jess Walter’s The Cold Millions
Bostrom…possessed one of those elusive, rather abstract personalities that perhaps lend credence to the simulation theory.
What a sick, understated burn
Have had some success just by reloading the page when I get this message