data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cafe/4cafe180227655559743b0fb17b751ccdce08dc3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c46f/4c46f62bde1f04aba85afa2acf3812f40ed19066" alt=""
Preferred search engine?
Preferred search engine?
Using the website from outside of the US shows it with its proper name, but then the asshat version in parentheses.
Refill with an adapter from a larger propane tank.
The refilled tanks can’t hold as much, but it works.
They can hold a bit more if you toss them in the freezer for a while before attempting to refill.
Removed by mod
In another way, GoT may have given them the gift of looking forward to a legit ending.
It’s a waypoint. As you move around, so will the waypoint.
Go to the waypoint to begin your next mission.
I’d say I go to see a movie in an actual movie theater once a year, but the truth is I probably go half as often as that.
It isn’t that I am not interested in movies, I just don’t see the value. I am supposed to pay for a ticket, concessions, and whatever goes into travel to the theater to watch a movie with a bunch of (probably annoying) strangers in a fairly gross environment?
My guess is my annual box office contribution is approximately 0.5x the current ticket price.
If, however, there was a $20/month subscription service which would let me watch new releases at home, I would subscribe.
Even if it was relegated to expensive hardware, like an Apple Vision Pro, I would very likely buy the device and sign up for the subscription.
$240/year would be a hell of a lot more revenue than my current $5.50/year—regardless of whether or not it would be exclusive to certain hardware or platforms.
Honestly, my current TV and sound system may not be as impressive as a theater, but they are good and I’d take that experience over the modified bus depot experience of a public movie theater.
It does look like that frog from that one Simpsons episode.
Those who profit from the status quo are the same who could have that information consolidated for review. They also know that maintaining your apathy is central to their business model.
If they have created a system by which they can profit immensely, but that profit could be taken away by the masses at anytime, the last thing they will do is enable you to care.
Your comment shows that they have been successful in tricking you into not only not caring, but actually advocating against your own interests.
He’s like an X-Men hero designed to find Ant-Man when he gets stuck between couch cushions or something.
Eating? No, of course not.
Look at this as the bat-world’s equivalent of that that Piper Perri meme.
That trackpad and palm rest is looking like Gizmo Duck
I’m no fan of google, but I don’t see how it could be expected to act as the insurer for people who have fallen victim to social-engineering gift card scams.
It would be a pretty crazy precedent if the judge ruled differently.
Gandhi quotes, so inspirational…
Forbes always has misleading, anti-Apple click bait.
When it comes to Apple-related topics, I never click on Forbes articles. Their coverage is inherently misleading, but that strategy must be generating click-through revenue. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
As long as someone is shredding death metal guitar on the roof throughout the storm, I approve.
When something like a hat may actually cost you an arm and a leg.