I hope it’s effective.

Because it’s fucking stupid.

Let’s hope. But as we all know truth is financially dictated in our “justice” system, so it is a gamble.

Got a coworker on my team who is type 4. He’s the glue that holds the team together, nobody knows anywhere as much as he does.

If he ever leaves, the whole team is screwed and the project is dead in the water.

Dual purpose phrasing, I love it

2nded

This is the intended use of the 2A, to deal with tyrannical figures like biz execs.

Here’s the full article if you’re interested:

https://www.dsausa.org/strategy/toward_freedom/

We cannot accept capitalism’s conception of economic relations as “free and private,” because contracts are not made among economic equals and because they give rise to social structures which undemocratically confer power upon some over others. Such relationships are undemocratic in that the citizens involved have not freely deliberated upon the structure of those institutions and how social roles should be distributed within them (e.g., the relationship between capital and labor in the workplace or men and women in child rearing). We do not imagine that all institutional relations would wither away under socialism, but we do believe that the basic contours of society must be democratically constructed by the free deliberation of its members.

A how to guide for jury nullification for those interested:

https://beyondcourts.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/Jury-Nullification-Toolkit-English_0.pdf

Nope

They can lie and remove jurors all they like. They can’t do shit about jury nullification if done right. It’s the logical consequence of a jury not being forced to give a guilty verdict, and repeat trials being disallowed.

If you’re a juror, it’s dead simple. Keep your answers during selection honest, don’t reveal anything you don’t have to, don’t talk about jury nullification, vote not guilty no matter what, and express the reasonable doubts in a sensible manner. There are plenty of in depth how to guides out there as well.

It’s legal. They just can also legally drop you the moment they think you’re a nullifier.

Then we were talking about two different issues.

With that said, I’d absolutely trust my life in the hands of Luigi over the hands of Brian Thompson.

Purity tests like this is also what’s landed us in this divided position. He did something good even if he’s flawed, and that’s enough.

For now that’s the case. But if there ever becomes a time when life outside of prison means starving to death, dying in a heat wave or storm, it won’t matter.

People still have things to lose. But people are losing things.

Putting people in boxes like this is how the working class divided itself.

A name to rally behind is good, regardless of if it is Luigi or The Adjuster