That’s the lamest way to carry out a threat I’ve ever heard.

Do what I say!

Or else what?

Or else…I’ll send you a…wikipedia link!

Dun dun duuuuun!

I doubt there is a federal, state, or local law, or in the constitution that states you have a right to getting testosterone or estrogen.

It’s bullshit that you claim it’s a higher percentage than the one I provided, but don’t actually know what it is? Look man, if you’re just giving your opinion, that’s fine. Just say so.

And how exactly are you going to carry out that threat?

Thanks? By making that statement I’m sure you know the exact percentage. Feel free to provide it. I’d be interested to know.

Of course they exist. You can literally see them. And they have the same rights as I do, assuming they are a legal citizen of the USA.

Both sides? Good grief. Not everything has to be a you vs them. And of course there is a higher number on Twitter. They have, what, 300 million active users? And Lemmy is probably .001% of that.

Plenty of fascists on Lemmy. They’re just not well known billionaires.

Yeah the rest is fine, but bragging about being featured in a magazine is kinda cringe.

And you’re on Lemmy. Most people have their echo chamber of choice.

Oh, wow, a concept someone conceived.

I don’t see an opposing view as intolerance, thus your link is moot.

“if you oppose my views, you’re a bigot, and I don’t debate bigots, hence I won’t debate you. I win”

See, I can put words in quotation marks too. Look how cool we look.

I’m not attempting to help or not help anyone. That’s not my job. But I won’t stifle my words or yours because someone, somewhere thinks it might be “harming” someone.

No. But the offer is appreciated all the same. I know you would love it more if you only engaged with people who think exactly like you, and only have the opinions and conclusions you do. It feels good to constantly have your ideology and agenda confirmed. Makes you feel superior.

No one was talking about gay people. This is the problem when you try to lump a bunch of alphabet letters into the same group. They’re not a monolith.

Basically what you’re saying is, conversation and opposing virepoints is harmful. Which is a fascist view.

I’m all for people making their own choices. But teaching children about sexuality is wrong, let alone assuming a child has the mind to transition their gender. This is sick in the head.

OP’s opinion about teaching young children, too young to grasp the concept of sexuality being wrong is simply their opinion. Many children grow out of gender identity disorder once they reach a certain age (not all, but many).

Your “science” is hotly contested around the world. Simply because you’ve chosen to accept a particular conclusion doesn’t mean everyone has to.

I’m not addressing the grooming nonsense or “used by biogts” comment as they are simply left wing talking points.

I do not suspect I’ll find meaningful dialog here as too many of you are hateful and close minded leading to an inability to have conversation that doesn’t include insults and name calling. Cheers.

I’m not sure what I’m supposed to do with this information.

I love the response you’re getting. A wholesome community until you have a different opinion. This is how you know Lemmy is simply comprised of the top crust layer of Reddit. The worst it had to offer.

:(

Nah, I’m not shooting anyone. And I’ll decide for myself what my moral obligation are, thanks.