Exactly this. The gesture had the right amount of ambiguity so everyone would think of it what better suits their ideas

And at the same time, you can still get credit for the paper in your resumee etc.

On the opposite side, being the only person working in the lab (especially when dealing with animal models) can be absolutely miserable - ask me how I know…

Exactly my thought lol

I’m in this picture and I don’t like it

It’s the second time in a few hours that I see a post about AI-written articles published in an Elsevier journal. Maybe I’m not super worried about these specific papers (since the journals are also kinda irrelevant), but I’m worried about all the ones we’re not seeing. And I fear that the situation is only going to get worse while AI improves, especially regarding images. The peer review system is not ready to address all of this

For higher chances of publication, I suggest to add a diagram of the JAK-JAK-JAK-JAK-JAK-JAK-TAT-JAK-JAK pathway

Can confirm. I use it under the chemical hood with gloves on, and even if I use just a few microliters I can still smell it on my fingers hours later

He’s unstoppable!

Ah, I do the same with figures! Hours spent just to aling them perfectly

I’ve been repeating this to myself for the last year and I still haven’t written a word. Guess my paper will never see the light

I usually never complete the “extreme” challenges present in some games, like path of pain and the pantheons in Hollow Knight, or the B-sides in Celeste. I try them, but when I realize that completion will require lot of time and effort, I really don’t feel bothered enough. But I’m ok with that because this kind of stuff is optional, and it’s actually cool seeing more talented gamers deal with them