data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cafe/4cafe180227655559743b0fb17b751ccdce08dc3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18141/1814163ec5385cb676a61d1f37d53aa16c39097c" alt=""
I figured he like dissolved or something back into the constituent powers. But he doesn’t want the kids to see that so he just goes around the corner.
I figured he like dissolved or something back into the constituent powers. But he doesn’t want the kids to see that so he just goes around the corner.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/page-page-disappearing-government-military-130001973.html
Thousands went offline
They were forced to start bringing some back
It wasn’t for nothing. It was to get off on it. Which made it more attractive than those doing it for money.
Nevertheless, these models are trained with broad yet shallow data. As such, they are glorified tech demos meant to wet the appetite of businesses to generate high value customers who could further tune a model for a specific purpose. If you haven’t already, I suggest you do the same. Curate a very specific dataset and very clear examples. The models can already demonstrate the warping of different types of lenses. I think it would be very doable to train one to better reflect the curving geometry you’re looking for.
Diffusion models have a very limited understanding of language compared to modern LLMs like GPT4 or Claus, etc.
https://huggingface.co/docs/transformers/model_doc/t5
Most likely use something like Google’s t5 here. This is basically only meant to translate sentences into something a diffusion model understands. Even chatgpt is just going to formulate a prompt for a diffusion model in the same way and isn’t going to inherently give it any more contextual understanding.
The simple answer is they are simply not there yet for understanding complex concepts. And I suspect that the most impressive images of impossible concepts they can drum up are mostly by chance or by numbers.
Modern “hang in there” kitty
Starfleet is very bureaucratic. I’d imagine a massive reason not everyone has everything is simply the hoops you’d have to jump through to acquire it. Imagine the safety regulations necessary for a galaxy class starship! Similar applies to holodecks. They are super dangerous. And you can’t just build a mansion anywhere livable as there’s usually something living there you would disrupt in the first place.
This highlights the problem with using that term. The two particles assume a state at the same time at a distance. It has 0% to do with the colloquial term.
Awfully geocentric for the nature of the universe.
If that’s the case, it could have been a craftsman’s magnum opus. A certification you prominently display to show your wares aren’t forgeries.
My God his head is enormous! Is this man average American size?
In Minecraft
Yeah, I just used what icon was handy. I mean if you were to do a more serious attempt,I’d draw it more like a concrete box, myself. Or more specifically concrete slots that line up with the numbers, driving home the point that it is a more permanent solution.
How about something like that? Symbolises data to device.
Trump sure as hell is only signing those EOs because of the titles they put on them. This fucking guy can barely read at a fifth grade level. Sure, he put the guys in charge of things that he wants or thinks he does cause they suck up to him. He’s a fucking moron.
this is what Connect looks like on my Pixel 4a
Though I wish it were a little more like which is a reader for hackernews
He doesn’t have money. He has assets. That means he need’s to take out a loan against his assets. And who would have done such a thing for a money pit that was twitter?