Thats a super cool outlook! Props to him for coming up with it. I really appreciate the response, i like your insights. I pretty much agree with all of that. There is another form though, people that have struggled with suicide their entire life, and for immutable reasons will continue to stuggle with until they die. For those people, there should be a humane path. But filtering out those from the temporarily depressed seems a gargantuan feat.

I do not recall, although if i did it clearly wasnt much of a hindrance. We do seem to be in agreement on this, although i have a tangentially related question for you. Do you believe suicide should be a human right?

Ok, then we are in agreement. That is a good idea.

I think that at low levels the tech should not be hindered because a subset of users use the tool improperly. There is a line, however, but im not sure where it is. If that problem were to become as widespread as, say, gun violence, then i would agree that the utility of the tool may need to be effected to curb the negative influence

Ok, people will turn to google when they’re depressed. I just googled a couple months ago the least painful way to commit suicide. Google gave me the info I was looking for. Should I be mad at them?

… so the article should focus on stopping the users from doing that? There is a lot to hate AI companies for but their tool being useful is actually the bottom of that list

As someone that is allergic to powdered aluminum, is she aware that almost half the sticks you find at the store are aluminum free?

Copyrighting voices to defeat AI would achieve nothing. Modern AI’s can be overtrained to the point where they strongly resemble their training data, but that is a problem that will be fixed within the next 5 years, which is way earlier than we will see any legislation regarding AI if our geriatric government is anything to go by. After that, AI will generate its “own” content that will be legally protected as its intellectual property.

I base this off of the fact that every media from humans is inspired by previous media. Fundamentally, once it stops directly plagiarising, there is no legal distinction between what a human would be doing and what an AI would be doing, unless we want to come up with a legal classification of “human” that explicitly rejects AI.

That opens up a whole new can of worms though. If you define human to be having human dna, does that mean the 3 babies they have been genetically altered are not human? Or are they, because they comtain at least some human dna? Does that mean i can give my AI a vestigial organ and now its legally protected? Does it have to run off a brain? What is a brain? If i duplicate the neural connections in a brain with mosfets down to every single connection, that is indisputably a human intelligence running on possibly non human hardware depending on the word of law. Or is it a human intelligence? They would react the exact same way to their organic counterpart, down to having the same memories and emotions. Does their non-biological hardware preempt them from being human? Does a pacemaker? Or neuralink?

Theres a lot to be worked out here, but it seems to me to be much less problematic to target the people wanting to misuse AI rather than targetting the tool itself.

God I remember deep fried memes. That was around when i decided humanity needed to be reset.

Tfw i use AI as a tool to get stuff done, not to feel good about the process and get to call myself an artist.

I think they were making a joke. Its the same vein as if you said you dont care about dad jokes then they made a really bad one and said “are you sure?”

The issue with the leftists as youve described them is that AI IS happening. There will be no stopping it, no containing it. Its already reshaping our world. And by downplaying its future potential(ai will never be able to identify objects, oops it can now. AI will never be able to make art, whoops it can now. AI will never be able to replace a human in every industry…) you are actively stiffling discussion on how to manage those effects. Anyone who has been seriously following AIs progression over the last ten years can see the patterns on the wall. The time of human workers is over. The only question is whether were going to use AI for the benefit of everyone, or for the benefit of the elite. And by convincing consumers they shouldnt use, even though you cant convince the elite not to, you are only pushing the dial further in the wrong direction.

RIGHT NOW we need to embrace AI. Humans have already shown that we are either incapable or unwilling to run a functional society. Putting something else in charge to make the decisions humans cant or wont is the only possible future we have. Ofc Im not asking to out an llm in charge of the world. But I am asking that people actually do something about their world leaders and start getting ubi implemented today. Because soon enough we will have an AI capable of making those decisions. And make them it will. And thats either a good thing under the post scarcity society weve built, or people rolled over and ignored the problem until they decided they dont need us anymore and get rid of us.

They did make the comic. They might not’ve made the images, but they are the ones that came up with the idea and put it together. It’s an expression from their mind, and therefore them watermarking it is a nonissue.

It doesn’t just seem scummy, it is scummy to gatekeep art.

Of course not, i almost definitely died.

Alternate perspective:

Like I could be stealing a man from a woman who actually deserves him

The dating scene is so garbage right now. I don’t consider myself a saint but the only people im matching with are snakes. EVERYONE is a user. Assuming you are not a literal nazi, that puts you ahead of the game.

Youre not literally the worst, so by holding yourself back you are potentially allowing that man to date actually the worst. You don’t have to be the best.

Nah post the One Piece

Why dont they give aggression displays? Normally it would make evolutionary sense to try and scare threats off before you attack them

I mean yeah, a peaceful solution is obviously ideal but… Isreal doesnt seem to want to allow that. If a peaceful revolution is impossible…

All I’m saying is that in the absense of more peaceful solutions, im not going to lose any sleep if every single idf member and member of isreals government made an oopsie with a window.

I don’t think theres anything that would make my eyes bleed just by looking at it. Maybe itd be different if we lived in a world with magic, where someone insulting me physically hurts.

And yeah, seeing my friends dick wouldnt exactly traumatize me, but it would definitely be something i wouldve dramatically preferred didnt happen. I think the mental damage would be comparable to stubbing my toe, which is at least a d4.

I dunno, at this point im pretty sure trump could demand the death or every first born and americans would bend over. It is beyond wild that we have not had an armed uprising yet, and i gave up hope that we will ever have one years ago.

Enough police to arrest street level weed dealers, but not enough to moniter A PRE MADE LOST OF CONVICTED PEDOPHILES. Bruh you can’t make this up. How are cops so maliciously useless.