- 5 Posts
- 4 Comments
Shin@piefed.socialOPto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.world•My experience with Palworld, and what I think could improveEnglish
1·3 months agoOne of my annoyances (if I can murder the language), is the fact that it was released a version 1.0 with dozens of issues. Quality of life is fine, but the lack of a vast majority of details kind of breaks the game. This isn’t a 1.0 final product release, it was a Alpha 2.0 release.
Shin@piefed.socialOPto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.world•My experience with Palworld, and what I think could improveEnglish
1·3 months agoOhhh shoot… I do use a very strict VPN and I can access. Would you mind sharing which VPN are you using, maybe it’s something that I’ve done wrong.
Just as a double-check I validated in a DNS checker, all the countries are enabled. I do have a heavy anti-bot measures on the page, with a lot of traps, if you ask a bot to crawl the page it will suffer.
Again, sorry for the trouble, and let me know the info so I can validate the VPN and check the access.
Shin@piefed.socialOPto
Linux Gaming@lemmy.world•My experience with Palworld, and what I think could improveEnglish
1·3 months agoLike the other already added, you can tweak the value, but if you add your bases in “easier” island the raids gets easier to handle. Additionally, if you circle your base with walls without any doors the raids are completed ignored. The merchants too.


I’m assuming this usage of entity as like a company, otherwise I didn’t get the meaning of this phrase.
So, companies will always benefit from automation tools (not limited to LLM), but all automation always improve the “Suplus Value”. In a ideal world this means less work for the same output, but in reality the expectation changes to have even more work on already overworked and badly paid labour.
So, any LLM for success companies… No. I don’t see it. But I understand the meaning behind the usage of automation.
To be honest, using US model, no. Using chinese models hosted in your own environment, maybe. The problem isn’t just the tool, and looking at the tool just as a tool in the vacuum don’t make a lot of sense. You need to evaluate in context.
This tool stole all the people online (and offline, considering that AI labs are destroying books for that). So, benefits people, no. Be useful, maybe.
This is very personal in my view, some people would say that needs to be handcraft, meaning very little automation, some would say that some is fine, while other would accept any slop.
For me (as a coder), when I’ve to change 10 files on the same parts, in the bast I would make a bash script to find the files and update each (when a
grepwasn’t enough), today this can be delegated to a LLM, still needs to validate and confirm. But this is me.Kind of feels, and to be honest, once I learned how to better use
unixtools, the machine have open to me. I can make easier code, I can link easily my essays, a fair shit ton of stuff got easier when I started to embrace theunixutilities.Sadly, companies a moving to spec only, no looking in the code, just in the spec. I can already feel the bug storm comming. Reason why I think it’s important to make a distinction between light usage, for a few snippets, some baseline on the contrast of full blind deploy.
And sadly again, a lot of people can’t read the full post.