One could almost say the same thing about cars. But there are ads for those everywhere.
But similarly, you never see an ad for a stove/oven anymore.
I think you’ll occasionally see an ad for a fridge or washer/dryer but it’s usually actually an ad for a local appliance retailer. The manufacturers themselves don’t seem to make ads.
Maybe it was from his Nobel peace prize acceptance speech.
I hate tankies, but I’ll shill for them based on the payment plan.
I’m the only real person in here.
I would say they’ve had superpower status since the 1950s, since the wars in Korea and Vietnam.
Ok then, who’s the other guy?
No problem. I’m not sure if all of that would run on all the platforms I use.
Right, so then my original translation is still valid, and might sound more natural in English.
In Java you would say “throw e;” (to rethrow the same exception you just caught.)
You wouldn’t just say “throw”
Or you could also throw some other exception. But the syntax requires you specify what it is you are throwing. (And sane in C++, where you could throw any object, even a primitive.)
So that was my question.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I was kind of being sarcastic. I haven’t written a compiler since I rode my dinosaur to college. Still it’s a funny idea. Could probably do it in C using a bunch of pound defines.
Yeah that sounds more correct.
How then would you say “we are protecting” rather than “we protect”?
Better yet, how will they determine what is “pirated content”?
Is that the guy from Star Trak?
Post the GitHub repo.
I will help you make this happen.
No it’s not “basically Java”
Aside from how Microsoft stole it, fucked the standard library, fucked the naming conventions, etc. You would never just “throw” without specifying what you were throwing.
Wouldn’t “our children” be “unsere kinder”?
“Eure kinder” would be your (plural) children?
Or in other words, “we are protecting your children”?
When you get them as an adult, they will be much worse.