• 4 Posts
  • 347 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2024

help-circle



  • I don’t have much issue with email as a technology. It does what it needs to do, and does it well. The client side software is what hasn’t budged in years - Search barely works, files and attachments are cumbersome, and spam is still rampant.

    It would be much cheaper and easier if users weren’t centralised under a few big providers that prefer to bar any and all access to said users if you’re self hosting, making it almost mandatory to use a private service.







  • Yeah it’s pretty much seamless. You just spin them up bare metal or docker (both are fine honestly) and follow any old tutorial for setup.

    If using docker, ensure you mount the qbittorrent’s download folder to /config/Downloads with a capital D or you’ll get a warning about paths being set up wrong.

    Also, I assume this isn’t really an issue for you unless you mess with the downloads after the fact, but *arrs expect the torrented media inside a folder with the title of the media on it. It picks through torrent naming conventions fine, but when I migrated some movies yesterday I noticed it wouldnt pick up any video files that weren’t inside a directory.




  • merthyr1831@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlFedora OBS Drama Resolved
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still don’t understand why Fedora feels it is superior at packaging a flatpak over the people who actively develop and distribute their own flatpak.

    Sure, the bugs might be fixed now, but Fedora still prefers its own flatpak repo over flathub for little benefit, duplicating the effort of dozens of developers for a worse downstream experience.

    If you distribute your app via Flatpak, what benefit is there over “disk space” (irrelevant for all but embedded devices) or the vague superiority complex of distro maintainers to manage your dependencies for you.

    Even if downstream fixes a bug or two, those should be merged upstream. Imagine if Fedora staunchly refused to upstream fixes to bugs in the kernel?








  • My current plan once new migration is completed:

    Primary pool - 1x ZFS (couldn’t afford redundancy but no different to my RPI server). My goal is to get a few more drives and set up a RAIDZ1/2.

    Weekly backup of critical data (eg. nextcloud) from primary pool to a secondary pool. Goal here is to get a mirror but will only be one drive for now.

    Weekly upload of secondary pool to hetzner storage box via rsync.


    Current server

    1x backup to secondary drive (rpi) 1x backup to hetzner storage box via rsync