This is why “privacy” doesn’t work on a closed system controlled by a third party.

wait until she replies her hobby is answering questions on asklemmy

Should have phrased it differently: Banning a post on a specific linux distribution is not a “ban on discussing linux” in general.

google used to work so well in the past when they still had these features

The linked article has a screenshot with a link to a post about openKylin getting removed. OP title is “Facebook ban on discussing Linux?” including the question mark. I don’t think it is accurate. At the same time I’m not defending Facebook in any way.

Discussing a specific linux distribution is not “discussing linux”.

Linking to a post on another website about a linux distribution isn’t either.

Make it

Contains a way to earn some kind of currency

So the browser itself is like an ad

Contains Ads

I don’t know why anyone ever installed Brave

No thanks

someone using xp probably won’t mind using some outdated linux kernel as well

You are not alone.

Just pull the tape?

That scared me a bit, last time I saw this picture it wasn’t animated I think.

PR does not help long term if you don’t deliver.

No one mention any far right talking points

I wonder if GOP owns shares in a VPN company?

What makes those safer to use than the phone itself? Is it because they are considered part of the car so you are “allowed” to use them?

Ok did any twitter user believe they owned their account?

since when “leftys” started to cheers for NATO?

If living in a nato country means you were able to live in peace for the past decades, I can see why people would like that, regardless of them leaning left or right.

Ok how do I translate these numbers to distance from mirror?