You get second PTO?

Make sure to scream things like “yeaaaah, that’s it!” and “more, more!” when you do. You have reinforce the visual denial with vocal denial.

That’s…not a counter argument. That’s not even disagreeing. You’re just saying it should be more.

TO’s comment truly is a mélange of victimhood and jingoism that, curiously, is as American as apple pie.

As if a joke more dated than boomer humour is a concerted psyop to discredit French people in “the marketplace of ideas.” Not to mention the myopic view of America in the second half. Baffling.

Anyway, hope the bundle helps those devs hold on and push through some positive change.

I’m confused by this comment. “The original is even better” reads like you are informing TO about the original. But you’d expect them to be aware of it, what with them referencing the joke nickname and saying “a new variation”.

It’s mostly confusing because there are clearer ways of posting the original comic for the uninformed than referencing the only person certain to have seen it.

…

botulism has gotta drive the price down.

Really? Figured it was raw.

…is the raw can cheaper?

Hey, you’re right! Why aren’t the mods executing OP!?

Well, I make home-cooked meals, at least.

I want someone to kill Superman with a Kryptonite sling bullet, like David and Goliath.

Didja cook it?

Idk if even they have understood the position they’re taking.

Their “Why should I be barred from taking advantage of anything that might benefit me?”

vs

Your “I am have nothing to give and no way to meaningfully help, so I’ll stay out.”

Is very telling.

Somebody asking the real questions. We demand answers!

After about 2 years of practice, I can confidently say "I wish I didn’t have to practice this. "

I find it as funny as the original post

I wouldn’t even really call this recursion. This is closer to a wrapper around the enjoy function to set variables so that “enjoy” doesn’t throw an error.

Eh, it’s consistent because it’s not entirely right.

“Slop” was a term for pointless, shitty, “earn a quick buck”-motivated commodities way before AI kicked open the door. A synonym with “schlock.”

Didn’t even assume it was a lie. Just figured anon was ignorant.

That is also my default assumption.

You speak about people reflexively picking their teams. But what about people that reflexively put everyone they meet on teams?

I hold no allegiance to Team Testosterone but, if everyone who sees me says, “oh, yeah, you’re Team Testosterone. And also I know everything I need to know about you now.” It gets a bit grating.

It is safer for vulnerable people to make those assumptions and I won’t begrudge them their safety. But I don’t have to like how it invalidates the lifetime of interactions I’ve had and I won’t feel compelled to laugh when a offhand joke necessarily implicates me because of the team I’ve been assigned to.

Probably wouldn’t, but some might be a bit miffed if someone said “shame men love crashing planes”. Even though it’s true most commercial pilots are men, so most plane crashes are done by men.