data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cafe/4cafe180227655559743b0fb17b751ccdce08dc3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
I suppose we’ll need to worry about that, once we get a net positive output from a fusion reactor.
I suppose we’ll need to worry about that, once we get a net positive output from a fusion reactor.
Well, the good news? A wider audience most certainly means a FLOSS suite that can parse the data from it. It doesn’t seem very opaque, but more like Markup++.
I think it’s telling that enemy and ally are closely matched…
Canadians likely have some nuance here… They don’t hate “us” the people, they hate “us” the country.
We did.
Boxed wine.
However, bottle design is pretty refined, and they are quite reusuable.
It’s like that to push you to buy two of them.
Eh, I prefer being able to specify block sizes, to maximize the throughput.
I dunno… I just use dd.
I gave you facts and number.
The facts are it takes 1.5x powerplants to scrub the carbon from 1x powerplants, using CCS.
So, it’s just better to NOT use dirty electricity, and convert it to a renewable, like solar, wind, or hydro.
Also, my company has as objective to becomes neutral by 2030 and 20% carbon negative by 2050.
So, your company will be paying the full cost of the carbon produced by your company? Doubtful. Nobody pays full environment price at the pumps. Or, their electric bills. Or their nat gas bill.
Fossil fuels are subsidized.
So, the US and Russia are the aggressors, so, they need to be repelled, right?
Which costs money.
Putin always had designs to re-create the Russian empire, with Europe included, and the US as a puppet state.
How are CCS carbon positive, when it requires more electricity to sequester, than it would to just not produce the carbon output, to begin with?
Yes, it is probably the oldest or second oldest server suite in the fediverse (diaspora is maybe older).
It was an early supporter of statusnet and pump.io, which are the earlier versions of ActivityPub.
It originally used it’s own protocol to talk to other friendica instances, but a lot of plug-ins came out adding support for everything, even Facebook support for a while.
Decomp still sequesters carbon.
Sure, burning them releases a portion back, but not most of it…
What do you think comprises ash?
Lol, ok.
You need to read up a bit more… that is not how we got oil…
We already have solar powered carbon sequestration systems, that require almost no maintenance over a period of a couple of hundred of years of operational life…
Trees.
Decomp still sequesters carbon… where do you think all the oil came from, to begin with?
Decomp still sequesters most of the carbon into the soil, which next gen plants uptake some.
Not to mention, a single sq km of algae sequesters tons annually.
And not even mentioning the add on sequesters: New trees bring whole ecosystems, and promote savannah and meadow formation, which also sequesters carbon.
How much carbon gets released building this technomarvel?
How long before it hits carbon neutral, if even carbon negative?
Now imagine if instead of playing technowizard… your company spent that money on planting trees?
Nothing like the very highly reliable pharmaceutical “science” done in the US, amirite?
Its not like we ever had “science” come from the US that said an extremely powerful opioid wasn’t addictive, amirite?