7·
1 month agoSon of gold would be “goldson”. “Goldman” would be a moniker for someone who worked with gold (miner, jeweler, gilder) or possessed/wore a lot of it.
- 0 Posts
- 58 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: March 15th, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
712·2 months agoZelensky said something about X You said “well he didn’t do anything about Y”
That’s whataboutism. You may have meant it honestly, but ultimately what that kind of argument does is attempt to reduce zelenskys response to this action by comparing it to how he may have done something not as good in a different situation.
67·3 months agowhispers you’re eating polymers. The bad part of gum.
If you eat celery or beans, I’ve got bad news for you
Your first link is about micro plastics, and they even say not all brands have them. So if a product is made of plastic and doesn’t always contain micro plastics (which are found in the air and water and soil and foods), then…polymers might not actually be plastics sometimes. Or in gum, many times.
Also silk, wool, cellulose, protein
42·3 months agoWell, not quite. You’d have to have rights to the land to do that. Else someone could ride up and just take it from you.
Polymer != Plastic. Plastic is a polymer, but not all polymers are plastic. Wtf is this source.
If you do it for side money, you’re only accomplishing that by fucking someone else over. Otherwise you wouldn’t make money.
28·3 months agoWhy should we know this
23·3 months agoIt is definitely an awesome looking critter though
This isn’t true: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoatzin
… Since Archaeopteryx had three functional claws on each wing, some earlier systematists speculated that the hoatzin was descended from it, because nestling hoatzins have two functional claws on each wing. Modern researchers, however, hypothesize that the young hoatzin’s claws are of more recent origin… A similar trait is seen in turacos, whose nestlings use claws on their wings to climb in trees.
2010, simply because of how english works.
If you say 2001 as twenty one, it’s confusing. Same goes all the way up to “twenty nine”.
And it’s more garbled and slower to say “twenty oh one” vs “two thousand one”, especially if you’re speaking quickly.
“Twenty ten” and up, however, starts making sense as a different piece of information and can be used easily.
Removed by mod
Content warnings seem to be useless or add stress
The ol’ double tap never fails
It’s been the consistent recommendation since day 1.