• 0 Posts
  • 55 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: March 8th, 2025

help-circle



  • Jesus, Buddy. It’s not gaslighting to explain how I interpreted your comment, and it’s starting to sound like your angry responses are to avoid explaining your position.

    Please explain to the class exactly what you mean by services not supporting Linux. No “obviously you know and are just pretending to make me look bad” stuff.

    Explain like we’re 5.


  • I’m… lying?

    No, it’s pretty clear now that you’re quite confused about the difference between apps and services.

    And they do support Windows.

    Oh god, tell me you’re not using the windows store apps for these services on a PC. Even my Alpha kids know better than that.

    Seriously, how can someone be even a little familiar with Linux and be so wrong about internet services working on Linux?

    And your attitude is just… something else.


  • zenpocalypse@lemm.eetoLinux@lemmy.mlBored. Give me a good "Living room PC" distro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It was the next sentence after the list of distros referenced in the response to you, and it is still very misleading at best.

    But, yeah, the second sentence. There’s a huge difference between an HTPC and an Amazon stick, Roku, or “smart” TV.

    Those have apps and must be supported by “platforms” because they are limited hardware with a limited OS.

    YouTube and Netflix don’t need to “support” Linux any more than they need to support Windows for an HTPC.

    If that’s not what you’re saying, you’ll probably want to elaborate because I expect there are plenty of readers giving your comment a “wha…?”

    “E” - since Buddy is trying to imply I changed my comment after he responded, no. I added clarity within a couple minutes, changing no ideas. Talk about gaslighting with this guy.








  • You’re getting down-voted, but, yes, this change only really affects user experience.

    I don’t know why anyone would think that what the LLM can access for context during your session is a limiting factor for what OpenAI has access to.

    If this change freaks you out, the time for you to be freaked out about history was the moment they started storing it.


  • zenpocalypse@lemm.eetoTechnology@lemmy.worldaight... i'm out..
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think you might be confused about the difference between giving the LLM access to your stored conversations during your session and using OpenAI using AI to search your stored conversations.

    What the LLM has access to during your session changes nothing but your session.

    It’s not some “I, Robot” central AI that either has access or doesn’t as a whole.


  • zenpocalypse@lemm.eetoTechnology@lemmy.worldaight... i'm out..
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That is the difference, but it’s a pretty minimal difference. Open AI hardly needs to give the LLM access to your conversations during your session to access your conversations.

    In fact, I don’t see any direct benefit to OpenAI with this change. All it does is (probably) improve its answers to the user during a session.


  • zenpocalypse@lemm.eetoTechnology@lemmy.worldaight... i'm out..
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m not going to defend OpenAI in general, but that difference is meaningless outside of how the LLM interacts with you.

    If data privacy is your focus, it doesn’t matter that the LLM has access to it during your session to modify how it reacts to you. They don’t need the LLM at all to use that history.

    This isn’t an “I’m out” type of change for privacy. If it is, you missed your stop when they started keeping a history.