• Brewchin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a wild read. I’d recommend reading the article, but the tl;dr is…

    He charged customers up to 20 times the ransom amount ($150K vs $8K in the example), paid the ransom to get their data back, and pocketed the difference as easy profit.

    He refused to reveal his “trade secret” method, but it was all A-OK when they thought it was “magic”, and now everybody’s mad at being deceived. 😄

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thats such a dumb idea, i cant believe he made it work so many times.

      I really need to start conning people, god damn

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Between this, someone stealing 2.5 billion from Binance, and the whole running America gig, I’m rethinking my life of not-crime.

    • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      So he provided a service and charged a high markup. This is just capitalism. Those idiots could have paid the ransoms themselves but chose to outsource.