As the service grows, I have noticed more and more people and bots popping up, only posting links to a news article and that’s that. Usually there is no post, no summary and nothing from the OP but the link.

What do you all think about this?

Do you think it’s a good thing, because it is providing content? Do you maybe find it annyoing and if so, why?

I myself am happy when people take the time out of their say to try to provide content, but for me it’s a bit low effort a lot of the times. Bots I tend to block immediately and people it they make it hard for me to reader other posts between all their link-posting.

But I am more curious how you all think about this and whether you consider it good or bad.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 years ago

        I suppose it depends on how you define content. Usually when people post it includes some discussion. Those types of posts get drowned in the bot posts however.

        • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Usually when people post it includes some discussion.

          Indeed, but as of now, I feel we are lacking a bit of a userbase to have enough content at all times. I know the part about everyone posting as much as they can, but I guess we still need bots for a bit

            • Lycan@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              We don’t need bots. It’s concerning some people think any community /needs/ bots. That type of infinite growth mentality is wack and I don’t subscribe to it. Like you, I block almost every bot I come across and my experience only continues to improve.

            • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I can see why some would like them. There are a lot of lurkers who just look at the content and move on without any discussion and that’s ok. For them I suppose it doesn’t matter if its a person or bot if the content is good. Doesn’t mean it’s good for the platform but if it’s kept to a limit and isn’t posting trash I not too concerned. That said those bots or people the post mentioned certainty are annoying.

  • atlasraven31@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like it will be increasingly used for propaganda, not discussion. By cherry picking articles, these news accounts will try to shape public opinion.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whether or not it’s posted by a bot, real users are the one commenting and voting on it. It’s not going to be useful for spreading propaganda unless it’s something the user base already believes

  • Dick Justice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Hate it. If it’s a person fine, I guess, but I wish bots weren’t allowed to create posts at all. I would rather see Lemmy grow very slowly than see Lemmy become a mirror of Reddit, with shit tons of scraped posts that have little to no engagement on them. That’s not a community, it’s a newspaper. I don’t understand the “massive growth at any cost” mindset.

    • incognito_15@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Counterpoint, I’m trying to find a good bot to be a matchbot for a community I made. It’s more effort than I have time to devote to posting a Pre-Match, Match, and Post-Match thread to the community with lineups, match events, and game summary. I wish a bot could take care of that so I could simply comment on the game in each thread.

  • redimk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t mind the news, I absolutely hate the bots.

    I said in another comment before, there’s an “AITA” bot reposting everything from Reddit, but, who are we supposed to answer if it’s a bot that’s asking? It doesn’t make any sense…

    If there is no engagement (or at least something that’s educational or informational), then what’s the point?

    If it was a “TIL” bot I’d probably have a harder time hating on it, but still.

    • Botree@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      …there’s an “AITA” bot

      That’s ridiculous. Wonder if there’s a r/roastme bot somewhere.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I get news from the fediverse so I’m very happy with others posting news.

    I don’t like repost bots though because they tend to be programmed to let non-fedizens control the agenda. Eg scraping what the people of Reddit upvoted.

  • Ironfist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    My problem with it’s poor quality sources and/or content. For example: yellow journalism. I want to be informed and have good discussions, not being outraged or click baited.

  • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I hate it. Some communities just fill up my feed with links to news articles with zero (or zero quality) comments. I either unsubscribe from these communities, or block the poster. In some cases they are so frequent, and with images that are effectively advertising. That and the zero comments, they just remind me of Reddit ads. I don’t think you can hope to build a community by drowning out any discussion with a flood of posts from news sites. If you’re the mod of a community with so little interaction, then you should be curating content and adding comments yourself.

  • ikornaselur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    It really annoys me, especially as there seems to be at least two lemmy instances that are 99% just a bot reposting everything from reddit… Really wish I could block whole instances

  • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    At the end of the day I’d argue that the majority of people want a “Reddit like” experience, with dozens or posts with heaps of engagement. I’m happy to have news / repost bots if the end result is a more engaging comment thread / discussion.

    When looking at older Reddit posts, I never enjoyed the comments where the discussion was OP focused. I’m keen to have them phrase the original question / link and then step back and let the discussion naturally form

  • Cryptic Fawn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As the service grows, I have noticed more and more people and bots popping up, only posting links to a news article and that’s that. Usually there is no post, no summary and nothing from the OP but the link.

    I am 100% fine with this.

    Not crazy about bots reposting shit from Reddit though.

  • danhakimi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m generally opposed to spambots and unnecessary bots.

    If these bots are just, like, CNN wrote a bot to post every CNN article to a news community, that’s annoying.

    But as long as the bots aren’t spammers / advertisers / just annoying as shit, it seems like they’re doing something pretty useful without causing any harm. Not opposed to it.

    Oh, and the other problem on reddit ends up being that these bots farm karma to make themselves look more legitimate, as though they’re people. That’s probably something we should keep an eye on long-term.

  • mysoulishome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I find most of the “news” and “technology” communities useless and boring for this reason and usually end up unsubscribing when a slew of blaaahhhhh fills up my feed. Lots of articles, stories etc just copied and pasted (or scraped) with no context, explanation, insight, commentary. Why does this matter? Why did you posts it? Why should I care?

    If you texted a link to this article to a family member or friend…what would you say to explain WHY you’re sending it? Would you just send the link and the title with no other details? They would find it weird. Share it with me like we’re friends.

    • Drusas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I have learned that the downside of moderating a political community (magazine in my case since I’m on kbin) is that I can’t/shouldn’t block bad actors because I need to be able to see their content if I’m to moderate effectively.