• unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    XMPP does have something that breaks my heart: it bounds encryption to a very specific client. So forget about migrating to something else and keeping your history somehow. Which is very sad for supposedly interoperable protocol.

          • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s a terrible UX. If you have a protocol independent from clients, at least the chat database backup should be standardized. It’s not.

            That means you’ll forever get stuck to one client. This is absolutely terrible for any organization.

            • leetnewb@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Why would an organization use OMEMO if it doesn’t fit their requirements? OMEMO isn’t necessary for encrypting xmpp communications. Also, I get the concern that only the original client will have a full history of the user, but most people don’t need a complete chat history. Or put another way, wanting a complete, unencrypted chat history is relatively orthogonal to wanting perfect forward secrecy.