• umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    why are we still discussing it then?

    that was clearly meant just to provoke.

  • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    You don’t start off a “this will never be acceptable” with a list of things that would need to be resolved; it just turns it into a negotiation.

  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    Can Canada just annex NYS then? No need to merge them all together, just take my state for now, and see how it goes.

  • NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Why are we talking about how difficult it would be? It’s not acceptable, we don’t want it, and we make the decisions about our nation.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    i dunno about you but i’d love it if new england became a canadian province, can we just like literally do the exact opposite of what the mandarin chief wants and let canada absorb some of the US? please? Fucking PRETTY PLEASE???

    • marathon@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      😉 You folks have a funny accent, you should take New Scotland, New Brunswick, NFLD and Labrador because they talk funny too. (jkg of course)

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        i’m from western MA so they don’t have to worry about me talking about Pahkin da Cah at Hahvahd Yahd :p

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    would joining the two countries be better for everyone? in some ways, yes . in a lot of ways, no

    but no matter what way you spin it. it falls flat on its face after a bucket of cold realism is thrown over you.
    The reality is Canadians would lose their rights as citizens and would be at best, passengers living in poverty. and at worst, would be slaves

    hundreds of thousands would go into poverty, be imprisoned by the occupants for not following their rules, or just straight up be deported or murdered. and yes I said occupants, it would be a military occupation for generations before the occupants even thought the new territory was ready to have some new states carved out. Until then look no further than Donetsk and Luhansk in Ukraine, what goes on there? Natives are evicted and killed, Immigrants from the “core” are shipped in to take their homes, the news shows off some north korean style tranquil scenes of everything working out fine, and there’s small fake ballot stuffed elections to pretend all is well since the takeover.

    there are a select few things I’d be envious of being part of the US over. but the fact remains that im not a fucking idiot, and It would be a net negative for every single person in my country. I’m not going to play devils advocate for people who would be trying to kill us

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What? No it wouldn’t!

    I mean yes it would in application. But the human species has been invading and changing governments in other countries since the dawn of time.

    It’s possible. I assure you.

    And I also wouldn’t be upset if it happened. As an American.

      • mechoman444@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        This is a world news sub… Not a patriotic America is awesome sub.

        You’re not welcome here.

        • samus12345@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Then why are you advocating for Canada to be merged into the US? Do you have it backwards?

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As an American, I’d be upset if it happened. It’s bonkers to just be like, “oh other sovereign nation NBD you no longer exist,” absolute madness.

      Besides we could just (re)negotiate the trade agreements we have in place which apparently are so bad. I wonder who did a bad job with them last time we changed the framework and name of NAFTA … Oh right the Trump admin.

      There’s no good reason, in my point of view, we couldn’t have an equivalent to the EU for North and South America - freedom of movement, establishing standards, less friction when it comes to trade - but that would require some true visionaries with a lot of influence and power to work. I doubt it would come to be but I wouldn’t be upset if it happened.

      Won’t someone please rid us of the meddling orange man and his sad lonely billionaire buddy.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m so sick of this bullshit. No. Stop talking about it.

      • commander@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        10 hours ago

        American here, keep talking about it.

        The world would be a better place if American and Canada became one country.

        The only people who would lose out are Canadians, but everyone else would be better off for it.

        • ilost7489@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I’ll die for my land before I become a second class citizen to your empire, fascist

            • Count Regal Inkwell@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 minutes ago

              It’s really not. You say fascist things, you get called a fascist

              The only people saying it has lost meaning are, in fact, fascists who are butthurt they were called what they are.

              And from your other posts on this subject you’re not just a fascist, but straight up a psycho who gets off on violence.

              I hope you seek help.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Ok, if that’s how you feel become a Canadian province then.

          USA for 11th province, let’s go.

  • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    A lot of these hypotheticals can be answered by “we’ll just slaughter anyone who makes a fuss” because that’s where our country’s moral framework will be if we ever march troops across the border. Like an ultra nationalist fascist state is going to concern itself with old treaties and popular sentiments.

    • PlaidBaron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      From a Canadian prespective, we would commit all the war crimes we could against an invading force, especially one we could not fight a conventional war against and win.

      Im talking sending American GIs home in unrecognizable condition.

      I dont care what government is in power by then. Invade Canada and be prepared to die in horrible ways, mutilated, and sent back to your loved ones in chunks.

      This is the only way we could win a war against the US and we would not hesitate to do it.

      • 🅃🅾🅆🅴🄻🅸🄴@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Realistically, we are so fucked. One single bomb on a highway or railway can completely decimate any one of our province’s ability to move people or goods and perform services. Our border is too long and wild to be defendable. And they could probably take out our entire military logistics in a single night of bombings. All of this isn’t even to mention that if they wanted to go all out insane they could make nuclear threats if the Canadian government doesn’t capitulate. I’m not saying we couldn’t resist once occupied, it’s just fucking hideous to think about.

          • commander@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Yeah, no. There will be no “canadian resistance.”

            Lol. Anyone who tries to form some resistance will be charged with terrorism and made an example of.

            You’re all bark and no bite. Canadians would rather live as Americans than die as Canadians. It’s just a fact of life.

      • themadcodger@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        You shouldn’t hesitate. And some USians would like to join you in eradicating the fascists.

      • commander@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’ve noticed this bluster among Canadians.

        It’s just bluster. I think surrendering is in your blood thanks to the French.

          • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            If by recent you mean at least a third of America’s history (longer if you count the complete lack of change in the south as a failed outcome), then yes. Recent.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That would be stupid. When Italians were conscripted to fight against British soldiers in Africa, most of them didn’t even like Mussolini. So what did they do? The surrendered and sat the rest of the war out.

        That wouldn’t have happened if the allies had a policy of mutilating their prisoners.

        Fascism is a hate movement, and hatred is self-destructive. You can’t defeat an enemy with hatred you’ll only destroy yourself.

        Offer an out for those that want to sit it out. Those that won’t, are targets that need to be eliminated. Not a target of your fucked up torture fantasies.

        • healthetank@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          22 hours ago

          To be clear, you think there would be an actual war with any safe space to store prisoners? The US would roll over Canada’s military in any open conflict, and crush any official bases. Any war would be entirely guerilla warfare, in which case taking prisoners is entirely unrealistic

          • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            19 hours ago

            Yep, occupied territory doesn’t have much opportunity for holding defectors, because it can be hard to prevent infiltration. Behind front lines is different though.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why would anyone think twice about this ridiculous word fart from a demented rapist?

    Move on, nothing to see here.

  • commander@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Canadians don’t have an effective military.

    Are they suggesting they would resist the US by force? That’d be a bad idea, way worse than joining.

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, start a war with a nation you share the longest unsecured boarder with, filled with people who look and sound like you, who also have a history of record geneva convention additions. That sounds like a great idea, what with the USs great track record at winning wars of insurgencies…

    • Genius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Nah. Fucking do it. Let’s start WWIII. At this point it would be USA against Canada, Mexico, Cuba, Panama, Greenland, Ukraine…

      Let’s get the entire world to gang up on America like we ganged up on Germany a few years ago

  • fiendishplan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    What about going the other way, we take up the metric system and coins for our 1 and 2 dollars instead of paper bills?

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Aviation has just got its dick stuck too hard in the imperial can. Having to teach material where g=32 makes me want to eat glass.

          • themadcodger@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Yeah, no idea on the pros and cons of dollar coins, just that they’ll never take off while there are still bills circulating.

            • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              My guess would be a knee jerk response like the move away from incandescent bulbs.

              I barely even use cash at this point so I’m not sure what the actual implications would be.

      • gheesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Aren’t dollar coins used in the US? Because I’ve used them in dollarized economies (e.g. Ecuador) and I assumed they were fairly standard everywhere.

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The U.S. already uses the metric system in strategic areas like the military, space exploration and scientific research.

      It would be quite cost prohibitive to replace all the road signs so we’re keeping the imperial system for day to day stuff.

      • bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s too bad they took away all the dual marked road signs when that dick Reagan killed the conversion to metric.

    • marathon@thelemmy.clubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      In terms of the metric system, just tell Americans that they’re still using the occupier’s system (British redcoats). 😉

      • themadcodger@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Ugh, we’re not even. We’re using the US customary system, which uses the British words but aren’t the same values as British Imperial values. They’re actually pegged to the metric system, so if the definition of a kilometer changed, so would the definition of a mile.

        We’re using metric with extra steps. Not to mention certain products are already in metric, and everything else has the metric on it already.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s all about perspective…Live in Manitoba or Saskatchewan for awhile and virtually everywhere is warm to visit.

        (Ok maybe I’m still a little salty about the -40 temps and my pipes freezing three times this winter.)

        • marathon@thelemmy.clubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Hey even us ‘soft’ Torontonians had windchill at that temp several times this season. And snow, helluva lot this year too, almost like Buffalo. 😂

  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    He never actually meant it. Why does nobody get it? It’s a distraction. Stop fuelling it. This headline is exactly what Trump wants.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Anchoring is legitimately a negotiation technique where you start with an absurd demand to set the framing of the haggling.

      Ie now the idea of expanded sea port security integration doesn’t seem like a crazy thing to exchange for elimination of tariffs.

      But guess what, expanded sea port security integration would drastically reduce our ability to economically pivot in the face of future tariff threats. Ie if expanded sea port security integration means the USA can prevent us from using our sea ports.

    • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      You don’t know that, and Project 2025 states that foreign affairs must be subject to national interests. The GOP is prioritizing access to strategic minerals as a long term goal. DT has stated the annex desire repeatedly and consistently.

      At the least, the economic assault is not a distraction, and it is obviously the initial stage in an escalation. People are already affected, and pissed.