• Maroon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    Is my lab the only one with a pipette tip washer? Like seriously, we save SO much money on tips.

    My lab in specific reuses tips up to six times before discarding them. It doesn’t seem to affect the accuracy.

    Caveat: we only use 1ml (blue) and 200 ul (yellow) tips, so not sure if other fancy brands work this way.

  • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I recently saw paper straws for sale in a carboard box with a cutout so you could physically touch the straws. Naturally, I was revolted.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 minutes ago

      My headcanon says that this used to have a plastic window instead, until someone pointed out that having a plastic window in packaging of paper straws is ridiculous, so they decided to remove it. A package redesign without a window was also proposed, but was rejected for budgetary reasons.

  • brianary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The straw thing seems like such an inconsequential place to start over things like switching to bar soap and bar shampoo to avoid using so many plastic bottles.

    • QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      bar shampoo gets a no from me, I have a HORRIBLE amount of hair/skin oil (genetic) and if I don’t wash my hair for even 1 day it looks like an absolute mess.

      good news is that when I’m older I’ll have absolutely glorious hair though lol

      • Gloomy@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 minutes ago

        I use bar shampoo and body wash. Daily, because i sweat a lot (genetics too).

        I use bar stuff because i have to shower daily. It prevents so much waste, because i work through soap fast, so at least i am not producing plastic waste.

        If you have to wash your hair a lot, thats an argument for bar shampoo, not against.

    • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Nooooooooo please oh no, pleasee, you can’t make me use bar soap please noo.

      I seriously hate it, maybe saving the planet is not worth it after all /j…= but also those bottles are refillable while straws are not only single use but are thrown away way more often.

      • Gloomy@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        Think of it in scale. It’s not just you. It’s millions of people. Even if every household only used one bottle over one year that still would be tons of tons of (easily to avoid) waste. And of course it’s a lot more than one bottle a year.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Plastic nowadays is inevitable, but at least the use of biodegradable plastic made from modified natural pulps is growing. Plastic is just a generic term for artificial materials and not all of them are harmful, and a lot of these also can be easy recycled. PET are often converted to filaments for 3D printers or yarns for clothing. Bad only if they are thrown into nature or into the sea

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Ah, but you must see that recycling costs money! It’s cheaper to pretend you’re recycling and just throw it in the oceans and rivers and landscapes!

      I hate it here. We even throw out online returns nearly 100% of the time for all it’s worth, it’s fucking crazy.

  • dingus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 day ago

    I work in healthcare and sometimes I think about the amount of waste I generate in a day and it’s wild

    • lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Plastic recycling in the home is basically a scam, but at the scale of a hospital where you’re generating large amounts of the same (known) plastic that’s going in its own bin, it’s much easier to recycle. I just bought a bunch of recycled PET that mostly came from medical waste.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Tbf, I remember the times we reused everything, even tubes.

      And it was a mess and there is so much evidence that the whole process of reusing is even worse for the environment.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      Health of humans is always excluded from plastic reduction laws and for good reason.

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yes, I would rather healthcare and science used 5x as much plastic as they do already and everyone else had to go completely wasteless than try to put any undue limits on them.

  • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    ·
    1 day ago

    I used to work in a warehouse that made a HUGE deal about the employees using the proper recycling bin so the company can get a nice check from somewhere or other for “going green”

    This warehouse recieved thousands of pallets every day.

    Each pallet is wrapped with hundreds of square feet of plastic wrap.

    Each box is individually wrapped with maybe 10ftsq-50 depending on size.

    Each box contains goods in plastic bags. Many of them with plastic clamshell packaging.

    The products get unwrapped, and placed in larger boxes on shelves.

    When the items get distributed to stores, the items were put in plastic bags, boxed up and wrapped in plastic wrap, boxes placed on pallets that were automatically wrapped by machines in hundreds of square feet of plastic.

    None of the plastic from the warehouse floor is separated from the general waste.

    Remember, it’s your responsibility to reduce waste.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’d be great if more and more companies packaged their foods through EcoEnclose or similar.

      It’d be even better if this was made default by legislation that eliminates the need for good will.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      1 day ago

      I loathe the trend to blame the end consumer for their waste and eliminate very publicly visible things like straws when the vast majority is caused by industry every step of the way. The amount of plastic I see in retail garbage bins is sickening, and the average customer has no clue because it’s all long before anything ends up on the shelf.

      Then people stop using plastic cutlery and think they’re helping the planet meanwhile it’s just a facade to keep the real wasters off their radar.

    • Thorry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve seen the same or even worse. Pallets of stuff would be received, all wrapped up tight in an ungodly amount of plastic. The pallet would be unwrapped, plastic discarded and the contents scanned to confirm the correct items and number of items were present on the pallet. After each item was scanned and it’s serial number recorded, someone would go to validate the items. When validated and found to be correct, the items were again stacked on a pallet and wrapped by another ungodly amount of plastic. The terrible thing was, as I was outside of the distribution chain, I had a view on the bigger picture. Items would often go through several of these places, each doing the exact same. The amounts of plastic each item consumed in the process was huge. But it was necessary, errors were found often, so the steps needed to be done. And the pallets could often get wet, nobody would accept soggy cardboard, so it needed to be wrapped.

      The issue is plastic is basically free and extremely good at what it does. A more permanent solution like encasing the goods in some other material, like wood or metal would be more expensive and do a worse job. It’s similar to asbestos, where the solution is so good, nothing else can compete. It took a mighty effort and strict laws to mostly abandon asbestos. I fear humanity has lost its will to live and won’t have it in us to ban single-use plastic.

      Some places did use metal trollies instead of pallets, but the pallets were never really a problem. They were almost always made from sustainable woods, be re-used often, till they just about fell apart. After which they were sent out for recycling, either back into a refurbished pallet, or a stamped recycled wood pallet or other recycled wood product.

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Its a matter of scale. If labs went through pipette tips the same way that fast food joints went through plastic straws, they’d be banned too.

    • Mavytan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Some estimates claim that (life) science produces about 2% of worldwide plastic waste even though only 0.1% of the population works in this industry. I’m not sure how accurate these estimates are, but I find them believable considering how much waste I see every day in labs. On the upside, this waste usually stays in contained systems and doesn’t end up in the ocean.

    • Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 day ago

      And we don’t throw pipette tips in the ocean, we throw them in the biohazard box. While not better for the environment, at least we don’t choke baby turtles.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        The lab is a much more controlled environment. I trust a lab tech to dispose of the tips as per protocol, which could reduce the number of tips that end up as litter.

      • dustycups@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        How many of them get incinerated? I know most large hospitals near me do that but do they take the waste from the gazillion small labs & diagnostics places?

        • Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          In the three countries I worked in (netherlands, belgium and usa) all level 2 lab waste was collected in biohazard boxes and taken to special lab waste management. I assume they get the same treatment as hospital waste. We did have the non-biohazard labs in which pipettes just went in the normal trash. I assume you can’t get a biohazard lab approved without organizing special waste pickup.

    • JillyB@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      No they wouldn’t. Banning straws is politically expedient, not effective policy. Straws are a tiny drop in the bucket of plastic waste. But they’re visible, largely optional, and have alternatives. It’s easy to make them look bad so a politician can look big by banning them. Your average person can feel like they’re making a difference by buying a reusable straw. The industrial scale plastic waste that happens out of sight is allowed to continue because nobody cares about actually doing anything. Everyone wants to feel like they’re doing something.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    To avoid plastic waste, they use now paper straws …wrapped individualy in plastic. Genius

  • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    Straws don’t pollute the oceans if you throw them in the trash. Well, unless that trash gets processed badly. Where I live trash gets burned. So I make sure to throw some straws in the river so the sea turtles can do coke off each others backs 😎

  • Tuukka R@piefed.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    How about people driving those trucks that directly dump mixed waste into the ocean? That’s a very common thing to do in South-East Asia. Plus, there are a zillion villages everywhere around there that dump all of their mixed waste into creeks going through them – to be brought “away”. Into the oceans.

    That’s where almost half of all microplastic comes from. Then there’s the other approximately half that comes from cars’ tyres. And then a part of a percent that comes from drinking straws and such. Hooray.

  • bacon_pdp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well take the global number of people who do that and multiply it by their average yearly usage and then compare it against the global plastic straw usage in tons.

    If it is far lower, it is fine.

    If it is close or higher, just advocate for proper recycling/disposal.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Do you think plastic straws are banned in the places with waste management that allow plastics to be dumped in the ocean?

      In my country pretty much every fast food straw lands in a fast food bin or in someone’s car and thence into household rubbish

      None of that goes into water courses

      Asia on the other hand has some pretty poor countries with crap rubbish handling

    • AlmightyDoorman@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why? Seems like a reasonable amount. In the boxes i used there was place for i believe 80 tips so when i had to pipet something in a 96well plate with multiple components that where not able to be mixed before i sometimes got through multiple boxes in a single session. (And yes i wish i had a digital multi pipet but even then it would not have alwqys been possible to use it.

      • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was joking, honestly. There are both multitip pipettes and experiments requiring a ridiculous amount of separate wells to be filled, both which will make a box disappear.

              • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                It takes the resources it takes. Can’t just go “we’re stopping doing science because it uses plastic, sorry everyone”.

                • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  Yeah. True. I’m a programmer of those things and I make an effort to be as efficient as possible with tips, ie mixing with the same tip and compensating accuracy for it. It’s more difficult but worth the effort imo.

                  Also reuse for things like reagents makes a big difference.