Brett Wilkins Jun 16, 2025

Flight-tracking websites showed dozens of Air Force aerial refueling planes departing from military bases in the United States and heading to Europe on Sunday, fueling speculation of direct U.S. involvement in the widening Israeli-Iranian war.

Military-focused news sites reported that around 30 U.S. Air Force KC-135R and KC-46A tankers were identified by flight-tracking software in what The Times of Israelcalled an “unprecedented mass deployment” to Europe.

  • Jaberw0cky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sounds like the perfect time for Canada, Greenland/Denmark and Panama to launch their preemptive strike and ensure regime change and eliminate US WMD.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 days ago

    If the shit hits the fan, I want too see every single fucking MAGA voter at a US Army recruiting office signing up for 11 Bravo, Grunt Infantry.

  • sudo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 days ago

    This would have to be the most unpopular war in US history and yet I think everyone Trump has surrounded himself with is telling him to do it.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      128
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sorry, best I can do is 2 trillion more for Boeing, Raytheon, Lockheed Martin and the like. They’re desperate man, they haven’t had a war for like 12 minutes, they need to be fed.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Zomg, Boeing planes being flown above enemy territory as surprise kamikazes (surprise to the pilots & crew).

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lockheed Martin did October 7?

        Basically 9/11 truther style conspiracy nonsense going on here.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What?

          It was a joke about how we have no money to spend on healthcare for the population, but we always jump to throw endless cash at defense contractors to supply the military…

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        4 days ago

        Not to worry, it’s made in china, shipped from china, and then people in detention centers will be forced by ICE to package it for that bonus fascism feel for those that believe it’s made in the US and and they’re getting a deal on the T-Mobile package that costs almost 2x other providers for the same service.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Other Americans just want fucking guns and affordable discrimination. It’s a sad day.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Be that as it may, we also only seem to vote for people that we know aren’t going to actually do what they say, except on the issue of immigration.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      And human rights. Due process. Rule of law and respect the constitution. Less inflation. More progress on our environment. Rebuild some infrastructure. Invest in some technologies of the future rather than the past. Leadership that understands basic economics and actually the art of the deal

    • HistoryPug@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Best we can do is give more people PTSD and then deny them disability or treatment for it. America loves dead soldiers, we can’t go too long without having a new batch.

    • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah. Unfortunately it’s been obvious to a lot of us for awhile that it would only come from the ashes of this country.

      • Corn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The media told them Hillary is the most qualified candidate in history only Biden can beat Trump, because he appeals to moderates, where things like free healthcare and not locking immigrants in cages only appeals to far left loonies.

        The average American wants these things, its just we cant risk the Republicans winning so we have to run on the republican platform from 4 years ago.

        • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          None of which are socialist.

          They are all systematically weaved out of the closed, private two-party system.

      • kayky@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is the truth.

        Americans have shown where their priorities lie, time and time again.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      We just want fucking healthcare and affordable housing.

      Trumps response is to offer army barracks and MREs, in exchange for you becoming cannon fodder in his delusional war games.

  • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    204
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    God I hate Republicans.

    Trump is absolute garbage on every single scale and stat, but it’s the republican voters who got us here. Fuck every republican voter.

    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      What got us here is the same two parties cycling in power for a century. If you believe war is red fault alone and that voting blue will change anything, you are part of the problem.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s really Democrats and independents who got you there. Unconvinced ones, though. Republicans did what they do, just enough Democrats and independents stayed at home.

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      72
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Hate is not going to get you anywhere.

      Yes some of them voted for him but a bunch of them didn’t.

      Stop being defeatist… inform yourself… look at the numbers. Look at the evidence. Get active.

      If you’ve wondered why everything looks like a coup since he got in, perhaps it is because it is one.

      https://lemmy.world/post/31401705

      https://youtu.be/AaKFx5rxdmA

      https://smartelections.us/

      https://electiontruthalliance.org/

      Edit: the upvote/downvote ratio on a comment like this shows how rapidly Lemmy is turning into Reddit. Nobody cares about the data, if you remotely sound like defending the GOP down the chute you go.

      It’s your loss America. I’ll sleep fine as long as we don’t have electronic voting systems here.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not that we don’t agree with you, it’s that your kinda acting like a dick. Change your tone and you might get a better reception.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 days ago

          And leading with “hate is not going to get you anywhere” and following it with more blame instead of action.

          Find your local mutual aid group. Volunteer. Protest. Get involved.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            following it with more blame instead of action.

            I don’t see blame anywhere?

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          [you’re] kinda acting like a dick

          I really don’t see it. I see only advice trying to help them get a healthier point of view. 🤷‍♂️

          Change your tone and you might get a better reception.

          This has literally the same vibe.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Edit: didn’t realize the response was a different user.

            I’m not trying to convince anyone of something. I’m just telling why you’re they are being downvoted, and it’s not because of the content of your their post. I’d post differently if I were trying to make a sincere point.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              I’m not the one who made the “dick” comment…

              I’m not trying to convince anyone of something.

              You’re saying they should change their tone. 🤷‍♂️ Meh. Whatever you say.

              • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Apologies, I didn’t realize that you weren’t the person that I originally responded to.

                I’m not trying to convince them. I don’t give a fuck if they change their tone. I was only telling them why the post wasn’t well received.

                • Victor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Right, fair enough I guess. I just can’t see where exactly the dickishness lies. I don’t see a “tone” anywhere.

                • Victor@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Hahaha WHAT? You’re a liar for saying I’m a sexist and for saying I said those things in DMs. Post whatever evidence you want, you asshole. I dare you.

                  Do you also go around saying men raped you when they didn’t?

                  God, I was hoping I wouldn’t run into people like this here on Lemmy. I thought Lemmy would be different.

                  At least it took over a year or two until I ran into one again. That’s to Lemmy’s credit.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Edit: the upvote/downvote ratio on a comment like this shows how rapidly Lemmy is turning into Reddit. Nobody cares about the data, if you remotely sound like defending the GOP down the chute you go.

        Many people just aren’t serious enough to take actions that are material beneficial. We want leftist ideas, but no one wants to form a party or vote for one.

  • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    We need to fix the voting system. ALL pacs should be banned and campaign spending should be limited.

  • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is basic dictator playbook, problems in domestic politics, start a war and problems change to foreign policy.

    Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is why I say Canada, Greenland, and Mexico are not safe. Added to the fact that all 3 countries have lots of resources the US needs.

        • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          If the US ever try to take out the Panama channel it would fuck up bigly international commerce. Basically only the US military is going to use it because no insurance company is going to cover ships going through them, and without insurance ships can’t even leave port.

      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wouldn’t this cause catastrophic domestic problems though. I think the US would tear itself apart trying to go to war with either of those three. Greenland perhaps less-so but still incredibly distasteful.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Putin has done this multiple times now, and Trump is following up.

      The United Russia party has had a chokehold on Russian elections practically since the day the USSR was dismantled.

      There’s a lot more to their socio-economic dominance than Russia just starting new wars. RU controls the national media, they have deep roots in petrochemicals and finance and real estate, they’re mobbed up, they have control of the military across the officer’s corps, and they’re embedded all through local government.

      Putin could be the biggest peacenik hippie in Russia and that party wouldn’t budge from its perch.

      He’s doing these wars because he’s fascist. Not because he’s doing 11D politics chess.

      • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Starting a war isn’t really 11D thing, it is more like “me big army, me attack” vibe. Even the orange orangutan can figure that one out.

        Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war. They know nothing else.

        Putin and his party are one and the same.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Russia has two exports, fossil energy and war.

          Russia is the only country left with a functioning space program. Also, one of the few remaining virgin steel manufacturers, in large part thanks to their domestic supply of iron and cheap energy. And, like Ukraine, it is a major regional breadbasket (one of the knock on effects of the war has been a one-two punch to cereal exports into Africa and the Middle East).

          They don’t have the manpower that China and India enjoy, so they never properly built up their high end service and manufacturing base, even in the Soviet Era. But the “Russia’s just an oversized gas station” line doesn’t hold up to any kind of close inspection.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              60% of their export is fossil energy

              China, India, and Turkiye have been ravenous in their demand for petrochemicals. These sectors have been growing at a breakneck pace.

              it is a banana republic

              Which large US business conglomerate is extracting fruit produce from Russia through armed occupation at below market rates?

              • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

                “In political science, the term banana republic describes a politically and economically unstable country with an economy dependent upon the export of natural resource.”

                They are so dependable on fossil fuel export that they try to sway all other nations to use fossil fuels and generate crisis on it to tie other nations closer to it’s only source of power in global market. Russia has less GDP than Italy. They are not super power anymore, and every nation should try to get away from their fossil fuels.

                • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company

                  it came to control vast territories and transportation networks in Central America, the Caribbean coast of Colombia, and the West Indies. Although it competed with the Standard Fruit Company (later Dole Food Company) for dominance in the international banana trade, it maintained a virtual monopoly in certain regions, some of which came to be called banana republics – such as Costa Rica, Honduras, and Guatemala.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic#Etymology

                  In the early 20th century, the United Fruit Company, a multinational corporation, was instrumental in the creation of the banana republic phenomenon. Together with other American corporations, such as the Cuyamel Fruit Company, and leveraging the power of the U.S. government, the corporations created the political, economic, and social circumstances that led to a coup of the locally elected democratic government that established banana republics in Central American countries such as Honduras and Guatemala; No official apology has ever been done by any banana company or the U.S. with only the C.I.A. backed dictator of Guatemala apologizing in 2011

                  :-|

                  They are so dependable on fossil fuel export that they try to sway all other nations to use fossil fuels

                  Ah, Okay. I think I understand the problem here.

      • Zenith@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Everything you said is true of the GOP/American Right as well, and they do it the same way, through oligarchy, it’s just a matter of they having more time to ratchet it down where the US is just getting its official start, although it’s been working behind the scenes towards this for decades too

  • kayky@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Time to waste hundreds of billions defending israel while our infrastructure crumbles and our citizens still go without healthcare.

    Again.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Gotta keep the Middle East under control so gas prices don’t get too high. Americans vote for low gas prices and then pretend to be upset about what needs to be done to keep them low. But y’all will keep voting for low gas prices, so it’s all hypocrisy.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      4 days ago

      I can’t believe he’d just… Lie to us like we’re a court, Congress or himself or something.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 days ago

      There has never been a decade in the entire history of the US in which it has not been at war. Come to think of it, there are probably like 10 years total, over 250, where there was not direct military action. I think. Have not recently checked the spreadsheet I keep.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Trump wants to try for an illegal third term and he thinks that being in the middle of a war will help his chances. “Don’t change horses mid-stream” or whatever bullshit.

    • known_unknown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Slowing weapons production??? While there are still citizens to vaporize to manufacture consent for yet more war???

  • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I didn’t call it, but there’s nothing quite like a war to distract the population from rampant decline at home.

    This one is weird though, Iran is allied with Russia. Israel is allied with the US. Historically, this made sense.

    But Trump and Putin playing war together would benefit both of them. It allows Putin to pull out of Ukraine because “Iran provided us much help and they need us now.” And it allows Russia to maintain the war economy. It benefits Trump because he wants to play war.

    Neither leader would have any actual skin in the game, it’s just people’s lives that would never contribute in another meaningful way to their power.

    I don’t like this. This is feeling more 1984 than 1984.

    Edit: I like this even worse after I read the specifics of the KC-135R and KC-46A. Each can carry about 200,000 lbs of additional fuel. A single F-15E can hold 13,000 lbs internally. 30 KC-135Rs can refuel an entire F-15E 460 times. Israel has 7 KC-130H (60,000lbs) and 7 Boeing 707s (which is what the KC-135 was based on). This isn’t just escalation, this is staging for invasion.

    • Tillman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      The nice thing about Americans going to war is that it reduces the amount of dodge owners drag racing late at night. Silver linings.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        yea its a distraction from all the protests, its really making him look bad, but he has the msms focusing on this instead, plus he was using the parade and the shootings as another distraction as well. right now the news practically ignoring the protests. using the. BANNER strategy, flood the MSM with so much crap its hard to focus on one thing. its also known as the firehose of falsehood which is a Russian strategy for propaganda.

    • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Before COVID, 2020 started off with Trump drone striking a foreign diplomat and nearly starting WW3.

    • l_isqof@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Both Putin and Trump are approaching dead-ends in their current campaigns. This ICE stuff can’t end well for him with so many people out last weekend, and Putin is well stuck in Ukraine, as you say. Whilst they may not be personally interested in the future of Iran and them having nukes by itself, they may need this to save their skin, actually.

    • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ukraine could throw a wrench in their plans by simply not accepting whatever Putin offers. He’s then left with “stay out of it and stay in Ukraine” or “join Trump and risk Ukraine flanking into Russian territory”

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It allows Putin to pull out of Ukraine

      Why would Putin pull out of Ukraine? Russia is currently advancing and has a much better position in this war of attrition, and the more it keeps gaining, the better the “peace terms” will be in the end. Putin’s not fearing for his next term since elections in Russia are manipulated, the Russian economy is alive and well, and in military terms he’s in no hurry

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Neither leader would have any actual skin in the game, it’s just people’s lives that would never contribute in another meaningful way to their power.

      Cold War 2: now with more stupid!

    • Attacker94@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not to mention that this gives him a legitimate reason to invoke the alien enemies act, not that he needed them in the first place, but it will tie up the courts even further.

    • lolonaut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They hope Iran does something, that warrants NATOs article 5 to be triggered. Either the other Nato countries follow along, weakening Europe, or they don’t, which basically desolves NATO and thus, weakening Europe.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Come on now, you don’t need to invoke some BlueAnon conspiracy to explain why the US would attack Iran; it’s been champing at the bit to do so for decades.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Everyone knew he wasn’t going to be able to curtail democratic elections without the excuse of a war. This is on schedule.

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean, Trump just illegally deployed the national guard and the marines in California. He needed the state’s permission (which he didn’t get) to deploy the guard and deploying the marines is on a whole other level of illegal.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          We’ve got an election in NYC right now, with a pro-Palestine Muslim threatening to upset Trump’s close friend Andrew Cuomo. Weird that nobody is claiming this election is being threatened by Trump, given that NYC has an enormous stock of Trump/Kushner accumulated capital.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Not anymore. The SCOTUS ruled already that they must accept have their ballots approved by the Feds, and feds can overrule their ballots.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              So, Donald wasn’t allowed to appear on the Colorado ballot, being an insurrectionist?

              • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                That’s a state issue, not a federal issue.

                Donald Trump was allowed to remain on the Colorado ballot despite the challenge based on the 14th Amendment’s insurrection clause, because the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that states lack the authority to remove federal candidates from the ballot under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

                There is nothing about “approval” from feds, nor is there a process federally to approve such things. There’s courts. That’s it.

                • ubergeek@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  So, the SCOTUS ruled the feds control who is on the ballots in each state, right?

                  There is no such thing as a federal ballot.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Unfortunately the republican run states will bend over whenever Trump tells them to.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I always thought Trump could curtail democratic elections without the excuse of war … by relying on a convenient terrorist attack instead.

        • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Nah, a war in the middle east is normal. Nobody would accept a normal situation as justification to cancel elections.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      No US president is a peace dove. Between supporting proxie wars to police actions to declared war, they all end up getting people killed by bombs.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      No.

      We had a lot of “I’m willing to make deals with anyone” rhetoric from the Trump campaign that low-info voters took to mean he was anti-war.

      But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

      The idea that you were going to elect an anti-war president went out the window during the primaries. Vanishingly few federal office holders have shown opposition to attacking Iran. Less than what we had in 2003 against Iraq.

      Everyone from Richie Torres to Mike Lee seem on board with a brand new Holocaust in the Middle East.

      • capital@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter). Its all the same neoconservative think tanks writing variations on Project For A New American Century for the modern government.

        That isn’t congress or the president. Pentagon leadership doesn’t declare war. Congress has the power to declare war which hasn’t happened for some time and since then the president has basically done so, although arguable that it’s been a “formal” declaration of war.

        This is what people voted for, up and down the ballot. US voters put Trump at the top and yes men in the house and senate.

        Vote better next time, I guess.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Congress has the power to declare war

          That they fully abdicated with the 2001 AUMF, which they keep renewing specifically so they don’t have to ever make these decisions.

          This is what people voted for

          The people vote for candidates, not policies. And they candidates they vote for routinely talk out of both sides of their mouths. NDAAs regularly pass with overwhelming bipartisan support, even as a super-majority of Congresscritters campaign against this or that component of them.

          Vote better next time, I guess.

          I was told to VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO because there is a Cheeto In The White House. If both major parties field pro-war candidates, what’s the move?

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        But the underlying Pentagon leadership hasn’t significantly changed between Biden and Trump (or Bush and Trump, for that matter).

        That’s not strictly true. Trump purged a lot of leadership that was loyal to the Constitution rather than personally to him.

        But your overall point about the war-hawkishness remains valid.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    worry not. remember this is TACO Don… he’ll chicken out again

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      He openly calls service members suckers and losers. I dont know that he much cares whats done with them.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yeah, it seems fairly impossible he’ll get fully into the war, and even lending a few bunker busters would be surprising when that’s risking a blowback on American forces.

      I would guess that Trump is expecting Khamenei to cave, because that’s what he’d do. Most likely, he won’t, Trump will be confused, and this will drag on and on until a regional nuclear exchange is on the table.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Iran or Iran’s splinter states. They have several bombs worth of uranium that’s almost ready.

          I doubt the US would get involved, and nobody else is going to for sure.

          • ansiz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            That’s the same talking point we’ve heard for decades but even US intelligence reports have said the opposite, even earlier this year. I’m sure they could create dirty bombs but that only requires nuclear power plant waste.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              No, we’ve heard they have some kinda enriched stuff, some centrifuges and could maybe someday have a bomb for decades. It’s a bit less theoretical now, they’ve been gradually enriching more and more since the US broke off the agreement:

              In February 2023, the IAEA reported having found uranium in Iran enriched to 84%. The Iranian government has claimed that this is an “unintended fluctuation” in the enrichment levels, though the Iranians have been openly enriching uranium to 60% purity, a breach of the 2015 nuclear deal. In 2024, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed interest in reopening discussions with the United States on the nuclear deal.

              They have a significant amount, too, and if I were them I would be hiding it carefully in non-obvious places where it can’t be buried by an airstrike.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Hasn’t Iran been talking about ramping up nuclear weapons production since like the end of last year? I don’t think they’re actually a nuclear capable nation but I could see them posturing like they are

          • ansiz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Posturing is what Iran does. They’ve done that at least since the early 90s. But US intelligence services have repeatedly come to the conclusion that Iran is not ramping up production, at least based on the briefs even from a few months ago earlier this year.