• Newsteinleo@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have never met anyone that didn’t like porn. Even your most prudish Christians like porn. Why do you think they fight so hard to ban it, they like it and are ashamed for liking it.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The social media algorithms that give us fake internet points have conditioned us to comply.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          That’s why the original commentor was complaining about it. And I’m agreeing with them.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It used to be porn but that was back when phone screens were 16:9. Now they are 18:9 and thats for vertical scrolling of social media feeds.

    • Ofiuco@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because reposters don’t care, they just repost as is, they don’t restore, decensor or remaster anything… And there’s no incentive to, people will upvote anything, there’s no minimum quality anymore (if there ever was at all).

  • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I absolutely hate that phones got so darn big. Im stuck with iPhone 13 mini even though I hate iOS with no clear upgrade path

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Anyone remember when Steve Jobs said in response to adding video support to the iPod that “nobody wants to watch videos on a handheld?” And then just a few months later, iPods got support for images and videos?

    • tino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      and when iPhone 4 was released, Apple also explained it had the perfect size because you could reach any part of the screen with your thumb while holding it in your hand… but also, antennagate. Steve Jobs was full of crap.

  • macniel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Look at all that screen real estate. Utterly wasted on ads and super tall fonts.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      also we have to encase our phones in cases because they’re not durable enough to survive day to day life. they could be made more rugged from the factory

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s mostly because we care about aesthetics. My work phone is some Samsung flagship model from two years ago, I don’t have a case for it (because I don’t give a shit his it looks). Its with me on all factory visits in dirty production environments and what not, dropped it multiple times, stored in my pocket or just thrown in my bag. Screen is not cracked, sides and back are scratched and dinged up, but nothing is broken. They’re plenty durable if you don’t care about minor cosmetic things.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          oh man your experience is so different from mine 😂

          any phone i drop brings it a little closer to being completely non functional as long as it’s not in a case.

          but i do agree with you about one thing: it is all about aesthetic. there’s tons of phones out there made with less shatterproof/scratch resistant glass, or think enough outer shells to protect their innards because when you buy a phone in a store you find the slim ones sexier

          • titanicx@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            They’re experience is different than pretty much every single person on the planet. Hell I keep my phone in a case covered and I still crack the screen even with screen protectors on it.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              How do you guys crack screens so easily? I’ve had it happen on one phone and I’ve dropped all of them, sometimes without a case, mostly without a screen protector.

              The one that did crack was from like the tiniest drop after 2 years of use but it was a cheap phone without gorilla glass IIRC

                • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Is it like a foldable or something? Otherwise I don’t get why a 1800$ phone should be so much more fragile than an iPhone a bit more than half that price. Or any of the <1000$ Androids I’ve owned before I switched over.

      • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I think most phones are plenty durable, people are just paranoid.

        And repairs are too expensive/risky. I think more repairable phones is a better aim than more rugged ones.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          oh! so we’re clear i’m not advocating against repairability. we absolutely must have that. but i’m tired of how easy it is to destroy an unfixable phone. we should have repairable phones that are designed to have long service intervals

          • Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Just so I’m clear as well, I disagree with you on that most phones are easily destroyed :) People are just overly worried about destroying their phones, which is pretty unlikely to happen, because repairing them is annoying and expensive. So they use a case, but it really isn’t all that necessary to do so.

            I’ve had my phone caseless (with screen protector), and dropped it plenty of times, for 4 years and haven’t broken it once. I’m also not too worried about breaking it though because it’s easily repairable. If all phones were I think people would forgo a case more often.

      • stephen01king@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah, I’d prefer to have a case I can swap once it becomes too damaged vs a phone chassis whose damage I have to live with until I buy a new phone. I’m trying to keep my phone for a long time, so the former is definitely better for my use case.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          there’s no preventing us from having thinner cases and thicker phones for such scenarios (and is probably the route i’d want to take, too, since i’m extra clumsy)

          • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is a good idea. I’ve had to learn how to disassemble and fix phones for the wife mostly and me leastly. She broke a camera glass - and a glass coated back plate. My issues were battery replacement and a USB port replacement and one headphone jack replacement. All things I managed to learn how to fix to keep our 5 to 7 year old phones going until we were damned ready to get a new one. Durability is crap for a reason.

      • Cousin Mose@lemmy.hogru.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        What are you all doing with your phones that you need to put them in cases? I feel like this is the equivalent of covering a high-end car in bumper stickers.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          A friend got one. A few months in it works flawlessly. It even has a projector built in!

          It really is a tank.

          It’s Chinese. Will it spy on you? Maybe, but so does Google, maybe the govt, the meta app has been proven to listen even when supposedly not active.

          Maybe the least invasive option is Pixel with graphene.

          I use a Xiaomi, fwiw.

      • Dagnet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah, specially after a couple of years and the phone’s internal battery doesnt last a full day

  • Berengaria_of_Navarre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    By stuff you mean animated GIFs of big breasted horse hung transgender anthropomorphic lions being violated by giant alien tentacles, right?

    Just say porn

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s so obvious I didn’t think it needed to be said. Who doesn’t watch animated GIFs of big breasted horse hung transgender anthropomorphic lions being violated by giant alien tentacles?

      Maybe if you’re a kinky pervert you’d watch .mpeg of big breasted horse hung transgender anthropomorphic lions and giant alien tentacles doing missionary in a committed exclusive relationship exclusively for having kids, but nobody is that depraved.

    • poinck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      iPhone 13 mini user here; I can relate. Anything bigger than this is too big for me. I will use it until it breaks or security updates stop. After that I will have to see.

      Older, smaller phones with PostmarketOS come to mind. But this OS is not ready for day-to-day-use, just yet.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        My latest was a zenfone 10, which was the smallest I could find that had good features. It was not easy to find anything though 😑

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same. It’s been a problems for way over 10 years now. I’ve upgraded to the pixel 9 pro and it’s just too big, even though it’s one of the smaller modern phones available. It’s actually smaller than my previous phone but it seems harder to hold one handed.

  • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    And what if I don’t want to watch “stuff” on my phone? My phone is supposed to be a portable “swiss-army-knife” of digital tools.

    They made tablets for the other “stuff”

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think most of the population are on tiktok and that crack, need big screen for maximum experience…

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ll never forget circa 2005, my friend was at the Montreal jazz festival or something. He told me about it and he said he took a video. He whipped out his phone that was basically a really thick pen. He showed me a video of another friend doing goofy stuff. Even on this tiny phonewith a tiny screen, it was really enough. I miss the time when someone took out his phone and you actually had no idea what to expect.

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember back in 1990ish, there was a guy involved in the local music scene who got interviewed on AM radio (Right before the rise of conservative talk radio, when there were still local hosts talking about local issues.). This guy wasn’t a big shot and not a musician, just a guy passabout music. tmusic. He went by the moniker Jim Clevo, I had the fortune of meeting him once. Anyways, he had insight as to where the music industry was headed. In the interview, he told how in the future we would be listening to music through our phones. At the time high tech was a cordless landlines with an answering machine built in. He sounded crazy, i couldn’t figure out why he thought we would all be holding phones up to our ears listening to music, I never had anything but a corded phone at the time. Not sure why I’m rambling about it other than this post reminded me of him.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean as soon as cassettes were a thing, mix tapes by holding the cassette to the radio became a thing right? Why not phones?

      Hell back in the 80s, before the breakup of Yugoslavia, they went a step further: they had a home PC that could be built from parts available at electronics stores. It used a cassette recorder for a HDD.

      A local radio station started broadcasting software, pc owners could record the audio of a program on a Walkman, then put the tape in their PC.

      There’s a past we never got where a radio-based internet existed alongside the landlines based one.

      • boboliosisjones@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        ergonomic, don’t have to move your hands.

        tactile, don’t have to watch the phone to navigate if you are familiar with what you are doing

        “safer” since you can rest your hands while holding your device without worrying about accidental touch inputs that means you can have a firmer grip

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          But it eats into tbr screen size if implemented the old school Blackberry way, instead what I’d prefer is a under the screen slide out keyboard + navigation pad, like the Blackberry priv, or even the LG wing with the second display screen could have been an amazing form factor, allowing you to control the main display from the smaller customizable touch display at the bottom, at least my main screen wouldn’t have all these finger smudges

          • boboliosisjones@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, but even just for menu navigation without keyboard would be an improvement. wouldn’t have to use more space than the old physical home buttons.

            However typing is the more frustrating element, so it would be nice.

            • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah something like the touch center button in the old Blackberry would be great for navigation, and they could add a fingerprint scanner to it like the old iPhone, and make that stupid top notch smaller

        • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          ergonomic, don’t have to move your hands.

          I can’t even begin to understand what you mean by this. It sounds like maybe you’re an iPhone user, which has almost no native universal controls. Android has options like gestures or a digital button bar, which allow for universal navigation from the same location that physical buttons would be in.

          tactile, don’t have to watch the phone to navigate if you are familiar with what you are doing

          Those buttons are contextually dynamic. You wouldn’t be able to use them without looking at the screen anyway.

          “safer” since you can rest your hands while holding your device without worrying about accidental touch inputs that means you can have a firmer grip

          How are you firmly gripping buttons without pushing them? This makes no sense.

          It sounds like you have rose tinted glasses inspired by the inferiority of iOS, but I’m making assumptions.

          • boboliosisjones@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I can’t even begin to understand what you mean by this. It sounds like maybe you’re an iPhone user, which has almost no native universal controls. Android has options like gestures or a digital button bar, which allow for universal navigation from the same location that physical buttons would be in.

            I don’t use iPhone. I mean the button does not move, a touch interface might require input anywhere on the screen.

            Those buttons are contextually dynamic. You wouldn’t be able to use them without looking at the screen anyway

            They are dynamic, but if you are doing the same task, they will do the same thing. Meaning if you are habitually doing a task, you can memorize it.

            How are you firmly gripping buttons without pushing them? This makes no sense.

            I am talking about gripping the whole device, not holding buttons. On a touchscreen device the whole thing is a button, so you only want to grab the bezel, which is as tiny as the designer can muster, to avoid accidental input. This makes for a less firm and ergonomic grip.

            It sounds like you have rose tinted glasses inspired by the inferiority of iOS, but I’m making assumptions

            You are indeed making assumptions. How do you conclude that advocating for buttons is tied to the device that revolitionized the industry towards touch only?

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I think iOS had gesture navigation long before Android, as default anyway.

            But I’m pretty sure that person is talking about how it used to be before smartphones, when you really only needed the ok/enter button and the d-pad around it. Modern smartphones can’t be entirely navigated by a single thumb that you don’t even move.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think a lot of the reason phones are getting bigger is because of battery life. You can absolutely make a small phone with a big battery, but then it would be thicc and people (read plebs) don’t want little bricks, they want big slabs.

    So for the few of us that want little bricks, we’re just entirely fucked. There are the Jelly phones, but they run Android, and I’d rather have a slab that spies on me a little less than a perfect brick filled to the brim with Google spyware.

    I’m waiting and hoping and waiting and hoping that Linux phones get to the point where I can daily drive one.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I am in this camp- little brick with a replaceable battery because if I want to watch a show or play a game I’ll use a different device. Absolutely no one caters to us. I would also pick a Linux phone if I could in that form factor but in the US there’s not even a smattering of choice. To make a Linux phone work you’d need an emulation layer to make android apps work (I honestly don’t know the state of Linux phones on this ) but without it you’d be using a windows phone with craptastic app support. That’s what really killed WIndows phone. Lets keep hoping brother.